...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research >In Vitro Comparison of Microleakage of Two Type Sealants 'Concise' and 'Embrace' (Wet Bond) in Saliva Contamination
【24h】

In Vitro Comparison of Microleakage of Two Type Sealants 'Concise' and 'Embrace' (Wet Bond) in Saliva Contamination

机译：唾液污染中两种“简洁”和“拥抱”（湿粘结）密封剂微渗漏的体外比较

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background and goal: dental caries is the most common chronic childhood disease.The use of fissure sealants andfluoride therapy is the most important ways to prevent decay.One of the reasons for the failure of fissure sealantetched enamel to saliva contaminated and to reduce the adverse effects of saliva contamination of the sealant andadhesive materials and the use of sealants which are less sensitive to moisture is recommended.This study aimed tocompare two type ofmicroleakage sealant wet bond in condition contaminated with saliva and Concise that isconventionoal sealant.Materials and Methods: 80 healthy human premolar teeth were divided randomly into two groups of 40, bothgroups after etching with 37% phosphoric acid, fissure contaminated with human saliva and a group with sealantembrace and second group withconcise were sealed.Sealed teeth was under thermal cycles (500 cycles 5 and 55 °C), then all surfaces with the exception of 1.5 mm around the sealant was covered with two layers of nail varnishand after the apex teeth sealed with wax. Then for 24 hours after dye 0.5% was submerged. The teeth were cut witha diamond disc for buccolingually amount of the fine was meeting every tooth stereo microscope.Results: The embrace sealant less than concise session was fine and this difference was statistically significant p =13%.It is noteworthy that 54 percent of teeth were sealed with embrace color did not show any influence; while 31percent of teeth were sealed with concise Microleakage were equivalent to 0 degrees.Conclusion: While there is no possibility of complete isolation from saliva, in order to reduce the amount of finefissure meeting, embrace sealant, which can be wet bonding property, is used instead of conventional fissure.
机译：背景与目标：龋齿是最常见的慢性儿童期疾病。使用裂隙封闭剂和氟化物疗法是预防龋齿的最重要方法。裂隙封闭剂搪瓷失败的原因之一是牙釉质被唾液污染并减少不良影响。建议对密封剂和粘合剂材料的唾液污染进行研究，并建议使用对湿度较不敏感的密封剂。本研究旨在比较唾液和简洁污染的两种类型的微渗漏密封剂湿粘合，即常规密封剂。材料与方法：80名健康人将前磨牙随机分为两组，每组40只，两组均在用37％的磷酸蚀刻后，被人唾液污染的裂痕和一组密封密闭的组以及第二组透明密闭的组进行密封。密闭的牙齿处于热循环下（500个循环5和55° C），除密封胶周围1.5毫米外的所有表面均覆盖两层在用蜡密封的尖齿后涂指甲油。然后将0.5％的染料浸没24小时。用金刚石圆盘切割牙齿，以使每个颊部的显微镜都可以看到牙粉的结果。结果：牙合密封剂少于简洁的时间就可以了，这一差异具有统计学意义，p = 13％。值得注意的是，有54％的牙齿被拥抱颜色密封没有显示任何影响;结论：虽然不可能与唾液完全隔离，但为了减少细裂缝的产生，使用了具有湿粘结性能的密封胶，而31％的牙齿用简洁的密封剂密封后等于0度。而不是传统的裂缝。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号