...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security >An Analysis of Link Disjoint and Node Disjoint Multipath Routing for Mobile Ad Hoc Network
【24h】

An Analysis of Link Disjoint and Node Disjoint Multipath Routing for Mobile Ad Hoc Network

机译：移动Ad Hoc网络的链路分离与节点分离多径路由分析。

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In Mobile Ad hoc Network, path between source and destination node changes too frequently due to unpredictable behavior and movement of mobile nodes. The data delivery to the intended destination becomes very challenging. The paths exist between source and destination node may be various types. Data delivery may be done with single or multiple paths. Single path sometimes not guaranteed about data delivery, so one of the better solution is multipath data delivery. Here, in this paper, we have considered Link Disjoint and Node Disjoint multipath for data delivery. For this AOMDV protocol with node and link disjoint is considered to evaluate performance. To evaluate their performance different node pause time considered with varying number of nodes. We have computed various QoS network metrics like throughput, average end-to-end delay, routing overhead to identify in which method of data delivery perform better and in what conditions. The results obtain shows that Node Disjoint multipath method AOMDV performs better than Link Disjoint method. The simulation work carried out using Simulator NS-2.34.
机译：在移动自组织网络中，由于不可预测的行为和移动节点的移动，源节点和目标节点之间的路径更改过于频繁。将数据传送到预期的目的地变得非常具有挑战性。源节点和目标节点之间存在的路径可能是各种类型。数据传递可以通过单个或多个路径完成。有时无法保证单路径的数据传递，因此更好的解决方案之一是多路径数据传递。在本文中，我们已经考虑了链路不相交和节点不相交多路径进行数据传递。对于此具有节点和链路不相交的AOMDV协议，可以考虑评估性能。为了评估它们的性能，需要考虑不同数量的节点的不同节点暂停时间。我们已经计算了各种QoS网络指标，例如吞吐量，平均端到端延迟，路由开销，以确定哪种数据传递方法在哪种条件下性能更好。获得的结果表明，节点不相交多路径方法AOMDV的性能优于链接不相交方法。使用Simulator NS-2.34进行的仿真工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号