...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series >Plant vs. Animal, Which is the Most Prefer Understanding of Evolution?
【24h】

Plant vs. Animal, Which is the Most Prefer Understanding of Evolution?

机译:植物与动物,最能理解进化的是哪一种?

获取原文
           

摘要

Evolution is one of the main subjects of biology taught in science colleges. Unfortunately, students seem less attention to this subject. In the subject of evolution, the lesson commonly uses the animal as a model to improve the students understanding. The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of tree thinking students who use animals and plants as a model in the evolution lesson. Tree thinking refers to an approach to evolution that emphasizes reading and interpreting phylogenetic tree. This study involved 20 undergraduate students enrolled in the evolution course for biology majors at Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI). The tree thinking ability of students was measured using Tree Thinking Concept Inventory (TTCI) of Naegle with a little modification. In this test, we analyzed student preferences using animal or plant models using phylogenetic tree diagrams. Results showed that students’ TTCI score was higher when using animal models (65.42%) than plant models (55%). These results suggested that students remain to prefer animal models compare to plant models to study evolution. Nevertheless, the use of plants as models can be an alternative to learning evolution in the future.
机译:进化是理科大学教授的生物学的主要学科之一。不幸的是,学生们似乎对这门学科的关注较少。在进化主题中,该课程通常以动物为模型来提高学生的理解力。这项研究的目的是比较在进化课程中以动物和植物为模型的思维树生的能力。树木思维是一种强调阅读和解释系统进化树的进化方法。这项研究涉及20名本科生,他们都在印度尼西亚本迪迪坎大学(UPI)攻读生物学专业的进化课程。使用Naegle的树思维概念清单(TTCI)进行了少许修改,测量了学生的树思维能力。在此测试中,我们使用动物或植物模型以及系统发育树图分析了学生的偏好。结果表明,使用动物模型时,学生的TTCI得分(65.42%)高于植物模型(55%)。这些结果表明,与植物模型相比,学生仍然更喜欢动物模型来研究进化。但是,将植物用作模型可以替代将来学习进化的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号