...
首页> 外文期刊>Israel Journal of Health Policy Research >Efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel
【24h】

Efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel

机译:以色列卫生政策制定者偏向效率和公平考虑

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundThere is a traditional tension in public policy between the maximization of welfare from given resources (efficiency) and considerations related to the distribution of welfare among the population and to social justice (equity). The aim of this paper is to measure the relative weights of the efficiency- and equity-enhancing criteria in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel, and to compare the Israeli results with those of other countries. MethodsWe used the criteria of efficiency and equity which were adopted in a previous international study, adapted to Israel. The equity criteria, as defined in the international study, are: severity of the disease, age (young vs. elderly), and the extent to which the poor are subsidized. Efficiency is represented by the criteria: the potential number of beneficiaries, the extent of the health benefits to the patient, and the results of economic assessments (cost per QALY gained). We contacted 147 policy-makers, 65 of whom completed the survey (a response rate of 44%). Using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) methodology by 1000Minds software, we estimated the relative weights of these seven criteria, and predicted the desirability of technologies characterized by profiles of the criteria. ResultsThe overall weight attached to the four efficiency criteria was 46% and that of the three equity criteria was 54%. The most important criteria were “financing of the technology is required so that the poor will be able to receive it” and the level of individual benefit. “The technology is intended to be used by the elderly” criterion appeared as the least important, taking the seventh place. Policy-makers who had experience as members of the Basket Committee appear to prefer efficiency criteria more than those who had never participated in the Basket Committee deliberations. While the efficiency consideration gained preference in most countries studied, Israel is unique in its balance between the weights attached to equity and efficiency considerations by health policy-makers. DiscussionThe study explored the trade-off between efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel. The way these declarative preferences have been expressed in actual policy decisions remains to be explored.
机译:背景技术在公共政策中,传统上存在着紧张关系,既要从给定的资源获得最大的福利(效率),又要考虑到人口中的福利分配与社会公正(公平)之间的关系。本文的目的是衡量在以色列卫生政策制定者的偏好中效率和公平增强标准的相对权重,并将以色列的结果与其他国家的结果进行比较。方法我们使用了以前的国际研究中采用的适用于以色列的效率和公平标准。国际研究中定义的公平标准是:疾病的严重程度,年龄(年轻人与老年人)以及对穷人的补贴程度。效率由以下标准表示:潜在的受益者数量,对患者的健康益处程度以及经济评估的结果(获得的每QALY成本)。我们与147位决策者联系,其中65位完成了调查(答复率为44%)。使用1000Minds软件的离散选择实验(DCE)方法,我们估算了这七个标准的相对权重,并预测了以标准概况为特征的技术的可取性。结果四个效率标准的总权重为46%,三个公平标准的总权重为54%。最重要的标准是“需要对技术进行融资,以便穷人能够获得技术”以及个人利益的水平。最不重要的标准是“旨在供老年人使用的技术”,排在第七位。有过担任篮子委员会成员经验的决策者似乎更喜欢效率标准,而不是从未参加过篮子委员会审议的决策者。尽管在大多数研究的国家中,效率考虑因素都得到了优先考虑,但以色列在卫生政策制定者重视公平的权重与效率考虑因素之间取得了平衡。讨论这项研究探讨了以色列卫生政策制定者偏好中效率与公平考虑之间的权衡。这些声明性偏爱在实际政策决策中的表达方式仍有待探索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号