...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Earth s Future >Response to Comment by Walker et al. on “From Data to Decisions: Processing Information, Biases, and Beliefs for Improved Management of Natural Resources and Environments”
【24h】

Response to Comment by Walker et al. on “From Data to Decisions: Processing Information, Biases, and Beliefs for Improved Management of Natural Resources and Environments”

机译：对Walker等人对Comment的回应。关于“从数据到决策：处理信息，偏差和信念以改善自然资源和环境的管理”

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Our different kinds of minds and types of thinking affect the ways we decide, take action, and cooperate (or not). The comment by Walker et al. (2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000750 ) illustrates several points made by Glynn et al. (2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000487 ) and many other articles. Namely, biases and beliefs often drive scientific reasoning, and scientists, just like other humans, are intimately attached to their values and heuristics. Scientists, just like many other people, also tend to read and interpret text in ways that best match their individual perceptions of a problem or issue: in many cases paraphrasing and changing the meaning of what they read to better match their initial ideas. Walker et al. are doing interesting and important research on uncertainty. Nonetheless, they misinterpret the work, assumptions, and conclusions brought forth by Glynn et al. (2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000487 ).
机译：我们不同的思维方式和思维方式会影响我们决定，采取行动和合作（或不合作）的方式。 Walker等人的评论。 （2018，https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000750）说明了Glynn等人的观点。 （2017，https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000487）和许多其他文章。就是说，偏见和信念经常驱动科学推理，而科学家和其他人类一样，也与他们的价值观和启发法密切相关。就像许多其他人一样，科学家也倾向于以最符合他们对问题的个人理解的方式阅读和解释文本：在许多情况下，表述和改变其阅读的含义以更好地符合其最初的想法。 Walker等。正在对不确定性进行有趣而重要的研究。然而，他们误解了Glynn等人提出的工作，假设和结论。 （2017，https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000487）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号