• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Einstein (So Paulo) >Ethics Requirement Score: new tool for evaluating ethics in publications
【24h】

Ethics Requirement Score: new tool for evaluating ethics in publications

机译：道德要求评分：评估出版物道德的新工具

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective To analyze ethical standards considered by health-related scientific journals, and to prepare the Ethics Requirement Score, a bibliometric index to be applied to scientific healthcare journals in order to evaluate criteria for ethics in scientific publication.Methods Journals related to healthcare selected by the Journal of Citation Reports™ 2010 database were considered as experimental units. Parameters related to publication ethics were analyzed for each journal. These parameters were acquired by analyzing the author’s guidelines or instructions in each journal website. The parameters considered were approval by an Internal Review Board, Declaration of Helsinki or Resolution 196/96, recommendations on plagiarism, need for application of Informed Consent Forms with the volunteers, declaration of confidentiality of patients, record in the database for clinical trials (if applicable), conflict of interest disclosure, and funding sources statement. Each item was analyzed considering their presence or absence.Result The foreign journals had a significantly higher Impact Factor than the Brazilian journals, however, no significant results were observed in relation to the Ethics Requirement Score. There was no correlation between the Ethics Requirement Score and the Impact Factor.Conclusion Although the Impact Factor of foreigner journals was considerably higher than that of the Brazilian publications, the results showed that the Impact Factor has no correlation with the proposed score. This allows us to state that the ethical requirements for publication in biomedical journals are not related to the comprehensiveness or scope of the journal.
机译：目的分析与健康相关的科学期刊所考虑的道德标准，并编制伦理要求分数，该指数是用于科学保健期刊的文献计量指标，以评估科学出版物的道德标准。 Journal of Citation Reports™2010数据库被视为实验单位。针对每个期刊分析与出版道德相关的参数。这些参数是通过分析每个期刊网站上作者的指南或说明而获得的。所考虑的参数包括内部审查委员会的批准，赫尔辛基宣言或第196/96号决议，recommendations窃建议，需要志愿者提供知情同意书，宣布患者保密，在临床试验数据库中记录的记录（如果适用），利益冲突披露和资金来源声明。结果考虑到外国期刊的影响因子显着高于巴西期刊，但没有发现与道德要求得分相关的显着结果。伦理要求得分与影响因子之间没有相关性。结论尽管外国期刊的影响因子远高于巴西出版物，但结果表明，影响因子与拟议得分没有相关性。这使我们可以声明，在生物医学期刊上发表的道德要求与该期刊的全面性或范围无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号