• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Ecology Research >Semantic vs. Empirical Issues in the Bear Diversionary Baiting Controversy
【24h】

Semantic vs. Empirical Issues in the Bear Diversionary Baiting Controversy

机译：熊转移性诱饵争论中的语义和经验问题

获取原文
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Conventional North American management of human-bear conflicts assumes that bears become more dangerous and destructive of human property if the bears have become food conditioned. Bears perceived as dangerous or destructive are usually killed. Conflict management to protect both people and bears focuses on minimizing bear access to anthropogenic foods. That can work where bears have access to sufficient wild foods. During famines of profitable wild foods, however, the key to minimizing conflicts can be providing food to bears – so-called diversionary baiting. Wild food supply is only one of numerous factors determining why provisioning bears intensifies conflicts in some situations, but minimizes conflicts in other situations. Identifying and quantifying the role of each factor is best done through formation of a more comprehensive conceptual model, followed by hypothesis derivation and testing. Literature synthesis and paradigmatic reconceptualization have thus far been hampered by terminological ambiguity. To overcome this constraint, we propose systematically integrated definitions for key terms: (a) conflict zones and sites, conflict foods, provisioning, incursionary feeding, baiting for diversion and other purposes; (b) numerous sorts of food conditionning: respondant, instrumental, opportunistic, transient, compensatory, agonistically induced, preferential, location- specific, person- specific, direct, indirect. (c) Food source descriptors: presence, abundance, density, accessibility, harvestability, availability, attractiveness, palatability, profitability, preference, reliability (predictability), and microhabitat suitability.
机译：北美对人与熊之间的冲突的常规管理假设，如果熊已经变成食物，熊就会变得更加危险，对人类财产造成破坏。通常会杀死被视为危险或破坏性的熊。为保护人和熊而进行的冲突管理的重点是尽量减少熊获得人为食物的机会。如果熊能够获得足够的野生食物，那将是可行的。然而，在饥荒的野生食品饥荒期间，最大程度地减少冲突的关键在于向熊提供食物-所谓的转移诱饵。野生食品供应只是众多因素的决定之一，这些原因决定了在某些情况下供应负担加剧了冲突，而在其他情况下却将冲突减至最少。最好通过形成更全面的概念模型，然后进行假设推导和检验，来确定和量化每个因素的作用。迄今为止，术语歧义阻碍了文献的综合和范式的重新概念化。为了克服这一限制，我们为关键术语提出了系统的综合定义：（a）冲突地区和地点，冲突食品，粮食供应，入侵性供食，诱饵挪用和其他目的; （b）多种食物调理：响应者，工具性，机会主义的，短暂的，补偿性的，激动性的，优惠的，特定地点的，特定个人的，直接的，间接的。 （c）食物来源描述符：存在，丰富，密度，可及性，可收获性，可利用性，吸引力，适口性，获利能力，偏好，可靠性（可预测性）和微生境适宜性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号