• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ethics in science and environmental politics >Open access revolutions
【24h】

Open access revolutions

机译：开放存取革命

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Open Access (OA) databases and publications are revolutionizing the storage and communication of scientific results. OA databases of physical and chemical measurements have been available for a long time, thanks to automated procedures of data acquisition and processing, whereas this is still not possible with marine biodiversity data. The pay-per-view policy is being replaced by the pay-to-be-viewed policy, with authors paying the expenses of the OA to their work. The ethical side of OA is clear: the whole world should be able to profit from new knowledge, not only those who can afford it, especially because research is often paid with public funds. Since funding agencies increasingly ask their beneficiaries to publish their work with OA, OA journals with unclear quality standards are proliferating, and some are publishing unreliable results. Private companies, with either pay-per-view (Scopus, The Web of Knowledge) or OA (Google Scholar) policies, rate the outputs of research. Funding agencies (e.g. Wellcome) are experimenting a further development of the OA strategy, launching OA platforms that they manage directly, with signed peer reviews. Similar experiments are being conducted with databases of raw data. Public funding agencies should also fully embrace this policy. OA policies are still developing, but the route towards a more democratic fashion of making the results of scientific research openly available is mapped out.
机译：开放存取（OA）数据库和出版物正在彻底改变科学结果的存储和通信。得益于自动化的数据采集和处理程序，物理和化学测量的OA数据库已经存在很长时间了，而海洋生物多样性数据仍然无法实现。按观看次数付费政策已被按观看次数付费政策所取代，作者支付了OA的费用。 OA的道德方面很明确：整个世界都应该能够从新知识中受益，而不仅仅是那些有能力负担新知识的人，尤其是因为研究通常是用公共资金来支付的。由于资助机构越来越多地要求其受益人在OA上发表论文，因此质量标准不明确的OA期刊激增，有些期刊发表的结果不可靠。具有按次付费（Scopus，知识网络）或OA（Google学术搜索）政策的私营公司对研究成果进行评分。资助机构（例如Wellcome）正在尝试进一步开发OA策略，推出他们直接管理的OA平台，并签署了同行评议。正在使用原始数据的数据库进行类似的实验。公共资助机构也应完全接受这一政策。 OA政策仍在发展中，但是规划了以更民主的方式公开提供科研成果的途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号