...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cell cycle >Open access: A revolution in scientific publication? Or just a minor amendment of accessibility?
【24h】

Open access: A revolution in scientific publication? Or just a minor amendment of accessibility?

机译：开放获取：科学出版物的一场革命？还是只是对可访问性的微小修改？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Scientific communication is a misnomer. The process of scientific publication is much less a forum where information is exchanged for information than a market where information is exchanged for attention. Nevertheless, the exchange of information for attention is a somewhat peculiar market, since it seems much more natural to sell the information one has produced laboriously for money. Why publish a discovery, why share it with other researchers, when knowledge is power? In antiquity and in the middle ages, scientists were not preoccupied with publishing their findings. Up to the 17th century, scholars, even in mathematics and astronomy, were pre-eminently concerned with protecting their claims to priority through secretiveness and mystification (Cf. ref. 1, p. 34; on priority conflicts, see ref. 2).
机译：科学交流是一种误称。科学出版的过程与其说是交换信息以引起关注的市场，不如说是一个以信息交换信息的论坛。然而，为了引起注意而交换信息是一个比较特殊的市场，因为出售一个人努力赚钱的信息似乎更加自然。当知识就是力量时，为什么要发表发现，为什么要与其他研究人员分享呢？在古代和中世纪，科学家并不专心于发表他们的发现。直到17世纪，即使在数学和天文学领域，学者也极为关注通过秘密和神秘化保护自己对优先权的主张（参见参考文献1，第34页;关于优先权冲突，请参见参考文献2）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号