• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Research: Journal of Library and Information Science >Evidence- Based Decision-Making – A Review of Key Literature to Inform Development of a Model for the Council of Oman
【24h】

Evidence- Based Decision-Making – A Review of Key Literature to Inform Development of a Model for the Council of Oman

机译：循证决策-审查关键文献以指导阿曼理事会模型的发展

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Evidence-based practice (EBP) has become increasingly used in public policymaking around the world in recent years and has been associated with improved decision-making as well as enhanced government transparency and accountability. Despite growing pressures to adopt EBP and the documented benefits of this approach, however, the limited available evidence suggests that, compared with the healthcare sector, governments generally have been very slow to adopt EBP in policy-making. In the Sultanate of Oman, where the development of modern democracy has been evolving only slowly over recent decades, it seems that current decision-making within the Oman Council may not be well informed by evidence, thus undermining the adoption of democratic processes in this country. This article presents the initial findings from a review of literature conducted for the purpose of developing a Model for Evidence-Based Strategic Decision-Making (MEBSDM) in the Council of Oman. It sets out key findings from the international literature about trends in EBP and the reported barriers to its use, from studies relating to government decision-making and from the healthcare sector, where EBP has been most widely used to date. The limited body of research relating to the use of EBP in Oman is also discussed. In the concluding section, some implications for the adoption of EBP by the Council of Oman are set out, as a precursor the development of the proposed model.
机译：近年来，基于证据的实践（EBP）在全球公共决策中得到越来越多的使用，并且与改善决策，增强政府透明度和问责制相关。尽管采用EBP的压力越来越大，并且这种方法的好处已得到证明，但是，有限的现有证据表明，与医疗保健部门相比，政府在制定政策时通常很慢地采用EBP。在阿曼苏丹国，近几十年来现代民主的发展一直在缓慢发展，看来阿曼理事会内部目前的决策可能没有充分的证据，因此破坏了该国采用民主程序的可能性。 。本文介绍了对文献的初步调查结果，这些文献是为在阿曼理事会中建立基于证据的战略决策模型（MEBSDM）而进行的。它从有关EBP趋势及其使用障碍的国际文献，与政府决策相关的研究以及迄今为止EBP使用最广泛的医疗保健部门中得出重要结论。还讨论了有关在阿曼使用EBP的有限研究机构。在最后一节中，阐述了阿曼委员会采用EBP的一些含义，作为拟议模型发展的先驱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号