...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Geoadria >Slovenian-Croatian boundary: backgrounds of boundary-making and boundary-breaking in Istria regarding the contemporary boundary dispute
【24h】

Slovenian-Croatian boundary: backgrounds of boundary-making and boundary-breaking in Istria regarding the contemporary boundary dispute

机译：斯洛文尼亚-克罗地亚边界：关于当代边界争端的伊斯特拉边界和边界突破的背景

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Boundary-making in Istria is an old undertaking. It has actually never ceasesed, not even today. Istrian peninsula has thus undergone substantial boundary shifts during the last couple of centuries (especially after the Venetian demise in 1797). But Istria carries its worldwide fame also due to one of probably the harshest disputes on the post-war European grounds – the Trieste territory dispute. In author's perspective, this dispute is one of the four main corner-stones of the current Slovenian-Croatian boundary dispute. The remaining three include the Kozler's boundary around Dragonja (Rokava) River, the ungraspable notions of Austrian censuses in Istria, and the narratives of partisan settlements on military jurisdiction. However, there are other very important aspects which significantly shaped the development of the dispute, but we will focus at assessing the importance of the aforementioned ones. In this sense, the analysis of the effects of the outcome of the Trieste dispute and its implications to the contemporary interstate dispute is set forth. By unveiling its material and consequently its psychological effects upon the contemporary bilateral relations, its analyses simultaneously reveals backgrounds of never answered question, why Kozler's proposed linguistic boundary around Dragonja (Rokava) River turned out to become a boundary of national character. Though nowadays disputed, there is absolutely no chance for both involved parties to substantially draw away from once decisively drawn line of a layman. Despite the fierce battle of words in Slovenian public media on whether should the interstate boundary be placed on Mirna (Quieto) or Dragonja Rivers, it will be argued here that the actual choice of the Valley of Dragonja as a boundary is by all means Slovenian. The arguments are based on extensive analyses of cartographic materials, relevant literature, documents, and statistical data.
机译：伊斯特拉半岛的边界划定是一项古老的任务。实际上，直到今天，它从未停止过。因此，伊斯特拉半岛在过去的几个世纪中（尤其是1797年威尼斯人灭亡之后）经历了重大的边界转移。但是，伊斯特拉（Istria）在全球享有盛誉，也是由于战后欧洲方面最严峻的争端之一-的里雅斯特（Trieste）领土争端。从作者的角度来看，这一争端是当前斯洛文尼亚-克罗地亚边界争端的四个主要基石之一。剩下的三个包括围绕Dragonja（Rokava）河的科兹勒边界，奥地利对伊斯特拉的人口普查的牢不可破的构想以及党派关于军事管辖权的定居点的叙述。但是，还有其他非常重要的方面会严重影响争议的发展，但我们将重点评估上述问题的重要性。从这个意义上讲，提出了的里雅斯特争端结果的影响及其对当代州际争端的影响的分析。通过揭露其对当代双边关系的物质影响以及由此产生的心理影响，其分析同时揭示了从未回答过的问题的背景，为什么科兹勒提出的围绕龙贾河（Rokava）的语言边界竟然成为民族特色的边界。尽管如今有争议，但有关各方绝对没有机会实质性地撤消曾经一度果断地确定的外行路线。尽管在斯洛文尼亚公共媒体上关于将州际边界置于米尔纳河（Quieto）还是Dragonja河流上进行了激烈的争论，但在这里将论证说，Dragonja谷作为边界的实际选择绝对是斯洛文尼亚语。这些论点基于对制图材料，相关文献，文档和统计数据的广泛分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号