首页> 外文期刊>Financial Theory and Practice >Efficient market hypothesis: is the Croatian stock market as (in)efficient as the U.S. market
【24h】

Efficient market hypothesis: is the Croatian stock market as (in)efficient as the U.S. market

机译:有效市场假说:克罗地亚股票市场的效率不如美国市场

获取原文
           

摘要

Traditional statistical tests of serial independence of stock price changes often show that stock markets are inefficient. Our analysis on daily and monthly data confirms this finding for the Croatian and U.S. markets in the 2002-2010 period. However, this result seems to be mainly due to the impact of the crisis of 2008- 2009. The observation of monthly data in the pre-crisis period suggests market efficiency in the U.S. and (rather surprisingly) in Croatia also. Daily data indicate a high degree of efficiency of the US stock market before the crisis, but it is impossible to conclude with a satisfying level of confidence that the Croatian market was inefficient in that period. Furthermore, an elementary moving average crossover trading system beats the CROBEX and S&P 500 indices from 1997 to 2010, indicating market inefficiency. Still, if the same trading rule is applied to the S&P 500 index in an extended time period between 1950 and 2010, the conclusion about market inefficiency becomes less convincing. It seems that (in)efficiency varies both across markets and in the same markets in the long run, but it still remains unknown which processes are the driving factors behind these changes.
机译:传统的序列价格独立性统计检验通常表明,股票市场效率低下。我们对每日和每月数据的分析证实了2002-2010年间克罗地亚和美国市场的这一发现。但是,这一结果似乎主要是由于2008-2009年危机的影响。对危机前时期每月数据的观察表明,美国和克罗地亚的市场效率也都令人惊讶。每日数据表明,危机爆发前美国股票市场的效率很高,但不可能以令人满意的信心得出结论,即克罗地亚市场在那个时期效率低下。此外,从1997年到2010年,基本的移动平均交叉交易系统击败了CROBEX和S&P 500指数,表明市场效率低下。不过,如果在1950年至2010年之间的较长时间内对S&P 500指数采用相同的交易规则,则关于市场效率低下的结论将变得难以令人信服。从长远来看,效率(效率)在整个市场和同一市场中都不同,但是仍然不清楚哪个过程是这些变化背后的驱动因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号