首页> 外文期刊>Evidence Based Library and Information Practice >Interlibrary Loan Rates for Academic Libraries in the United States of America Have Increased Despite the Availability of Electronic Databases, but Fulfilment Rates Have Decreased
【24h】

Interlibrary Loan Rates for Academic Libraries in the United States of America Have Increased Despite the Availability of Electronic Databases, but Fulfilment Rates Have Decreased

机译:尽管有电子数据库,但美利坚合众国大学图书馆的馆际互借利率有所提高,但实现率却有所下降

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives – To determine the number of interlibrary loan (ILL) requests in academic libraries in the United States of America over the period 1997-2008, and how various factors have influenced these rates. These factors included electronic database subscriptions, size of print journal and monograph collections, and the presence of link resolvers. Data were collected from libraries as both lenders and borrowers. The study also looked at whether the number of professional staff in an ILL department had changed during the period studied, and whether ILL departments led by a professional librarian correlated positively with rates of ILL. Design – Online questionnaire. Setting – Academic library members of the Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) ILL scheme in the United States of America. Subjects – A total of 442 academic library members of the OCLC ILL scheme. Methods – An electronic questionnaire was sent to 1433 academic library member institutions of the OCLC ILL scheme. Data were collected for libraries as both lending and borrowing institutions. Data were analyzed using a statistical software package, specifically to calculate Spearman’s rank correlations between the variables and rates of ILL. Main Results – Responses to the electronic questionnaire were received from 442 (31%) academic libraries. There was an overall increase in the number of ILL requests in the period 1997-2008. The number of ILL requests which were unfulfilled also increased during this period. There was a positive correlation between rates of ILL and all of the variables investigated, with the strongest correlations with size of print monograph collections and size of print journal collections. The numbers of staff in ILL departments remained relatively static during the period covered by the study, although the majority of staff working in ILL was composed of paraprofessionals. There was a weak positive correlation between numbers of ILL requests and whether ILL departments were headed by a professional librarian. Conclusions – Access to full text electronic databases has not decreased the numbers of ILL requests in academic libraries in the United States of America. In fact, ILL requests have increased, probably due to the fact that students and staff of academic libraries now have access to a larger number of citations through online databases and other information sources. The authors suggest that the increase in unfulfilled ILL requests is also due to this increased access. Libraries with large print collections are more likely to receive ILL requests precisely because they have more material to lend out, and may make more ILL requests due to the research output of their presumably larger institutions. There may be a higher number of ILL requests fulfilled by departments headed by a professional librarian because a librarian has more knowledge of sources to fulfil requests.
机译:目标–确定美利坚合众国1997-2008年间大学图书馆中的馆际互借(ILL)请求数量,以及各种因素如何影响这些比率。这些因素包括电子数据库订阅,印刷期刊和专着的规模以及链接解析器的存在。数据是作为借方和借方从图书馆收集的。该研究还研究了在研究期间,ILL部门的专业人员数量是否发生了变化,以及由专业图书馆员领导的ILL部门与ILL率是否呈正相关。设计–在线问卷。设置–美国在线计算机图书馆中心(OCLC)ILL计划的学术图书馆成员。主题– OCLC ILL计划的442名学术图书馆成员。方法–将电子问卷发送给OCLC ILL计划的1433个高校图书馆成员机构。为图书馆作为借阅和借阅机构收集了数据。使用统计软件包对数据进行了分析,专门用于计算Spearman在变量和ILL发生率之间的排名相关性。主要结果–从442个(31%)大学图书馆收到了对电子问卷的答复。在1997-2008年期间,ILL申请的总体数量有所增加。在此期间,未满足的ILL请求数量也有所增加。 ILL的发生率与所有调查变量之间呈正相关,与印刷专着的规模和印刷期刊的规模之间的相关性最强。在研究覆盖的时期内,ILL部门的员工数量保持相对稳定,尽管在ILL中工作的大多数员工都是准专业人士。 ILL请求的数量与ILL部门是否由专业图书馆员领导之间存在弱的正相关关系。结论–访问全文电子数据库并没有减少美利坚合众国大学图书馆对ILL的请求数量。实际上,ILL的请求有所增加,这可能是由于现在图书馆和图书馆的学生和工作人员可以通过在线数据库和其他信息来源获得大量引用。作者建议,未完成的ILL请求的增加也是由于访问量的增加。拥有大量印刷品的图书馆更可能收到ILL请求,这恰恰是因为它们有更多可借出的材料,并且由于其规模较大的研究机构的研究成果,可能会提出更多ILL请求。由专业图书馆员领导的部门可能会执行更多的ILL请求,因为图书馆员对请求的来源有更多的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号