• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence Based Library and Information Practice >Further Research is Required to Determine Which Database Products Best Support Research in Public Administration
【24h】

Further Research is Required to Determine Which Database Products Best Support Research in Public Administration

机译：需要进一步研究以确定哪种数据库产品在公共管理中最好地支持研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A review of: Tucker, James, Corey. “Database Support for Research in Public Administration.” Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 24.1 (2005): 47-60. Objective – To examine the extent to which six commercial database products support student and faculty research in the area of public administration. Design – Bibliometric study. Setting – Academic library in the United States. Subjects – Six commercial business-related database products were examined: Proquest’s ABI/INFORM Global edition (ABI), EBSCO’s Business Source Premier (BSP), Gale’s General BusinessFile ASAP (GBF), EBSCO’s Academic Search Premier (ASP), EBSCO’s Expanded Academic Index (EAI) and Proquest’s International Academic Research Library (ARL). Three of the databases (ABI, BSP, GBF) were chosen because they address the management, human resource, and financing elements of public administration. The other three (ASP, EAI, ARL) were included because of their multidisciplinary coverage. Methods – A list of journal titles covering public administration was assembled from the Institute of Scientific Information’s Social Sciences Citation Index and previously published lists of recommended journals in the field. The author then compared the compiled list of journal titles against the journal titles indexed by the six database products. He further analyzed the results by level of journal coverage (only, full-text, and full-text with embargo) and subject area based on categories described in Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory. Main Results – The study found that three of the six database products --EAI, BSP, and ARL -- provide indexing for the greatest number of public administration journals contained in the compiled list. EIA and ARL cover the greatest number of those that are full-text journals, while BSP and ASP cover the greatest number of those full-text journals limited by publisher embargoes. Conclusion – The author concludes that of the six databases examined, EAI, BSP, and ARL are the best for public administration research, based on their strength in the subject areas of public administration and public finance. The author also recommends that librarians in the field of public administration “carefully evaluate each database to see which one best fits the needs of the library and patrons” (56).
机译：评论：塔克，詹姆斯，科里。 “公共管理研究的数据库支持。”行为与社会科学图书馆员24.1（2005）：47-60。目的–研究六种商业数据库产品在多大程度上支持公共行政领域的学生和教师研究。设计–文献计量研究。设置-美国的大学图书馆。主题–检查了六种与商业业务相关的数据库产品：Proquest的ABI / INFORM全球版（ABI），EBSCO的商业资源高级版（BSP），Gale的General BusinessFile ASAP（GBF），EBSCO的学术搜索Premier（ASP），EBSCO的扩展学术索引（EAI）和Proquest的国际学术研究图书馆（ARL）。选择了三个数据库（ABI，BSP，GBF），因为它们涉及公共管理的管理，人力资源和财务要素。由于它们的跨学科覆盖面，其他三个（ASP，EAI，ARL）也被包括在内。方法–从科学信息研究所的《社会科学引文索引》中收集了涵盖公共管理的期刊标题列表，并在以前发布了该领域的推荐期刊列表。然后，作者将编译后的期刊名称列表与这六个数据库产品索引的期刊名称进行了比较。他根据《乌尔里希期刊目录》中描述的类别，按期刊覆盖率（仅限全文和带有禁运的全文）和主题领域进一步分析了结果。主要结果–研究发现，六个数据库产品（EAI，BSP和ARL）中的三个为编制的清单中包含的最大数量的公共管理期刊提供了索引。在全文期刊中，EIA和ARL所占比例最大，而在出版商禁运的限制下，BSP和ASP涵盖了全文本中的比例最高。结论–作者得出的结论是，根据六个数据库中的EAI，BSP和ARL，它们在公共行政和公共财政领域的实力最强，因此最适合公共行政研究。作者还建议公共管理领域的图书馆员“仔细评估每个数据库，以找出哪个数据库最适合图书馆和读者的需求”（56）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号