• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>First Monday >Sluts ‘r’ us: Intersections of gender, protocol and agency in the digital age
【24h】

Sluts ‘r’ us: Intersections of gender, protocol and agency in the digital age

机译：荡妇“ r”我们：数字时代的性别，协议和代理机构的交汇处

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

When it comes to examining the relationship between digital technologies and gender, our discourse has fallen into two pre-wired sets of responses: The first set approaches gender as something that is operationalised through the digital, thus producing the rhetoric of ICT4D and women’s empowerment through access to the digital. This also gives rise to the DIY cultures that makes women responsible for the safety of their bodies and selves, and puts the blame of sexual violence or abuse back onto the body of the woman. The second set approaches the digital as something that operates gender, examining the regulations and control that the digital technologies exercise on women’s bodies, gender and desires. This focuses on practices like revenge pornography, privacy, protection and security in the age of growing cyber-bullying and attacks on women. In both these discourses, there is always the imagination of one of the two sites as passive — either the gendered body uses digital technologies for its intentions, or the digital technologies shape the gendered body following the protocols of algorithmic design. By looking at the figure of the digital slut, as it emerges in popular cultural practices and debates in regulation, that this separation of gendered intention from machine protocol fails to accommodate for the quotidian and varied engagements of bodies and technologies, and thus produces flawed regimes of regulation and law around digital gender. I propose two strategies to understand ‘digital gender’ as a moment of configuration rather than a finite resolved category: The first is to combine the protocols of technology with the metaphors of the body, producing a metaphorocol, which enables us to move beyond the aporetic production of body and technology in contemporary discourse. The second is to relocate agency and question the body as actor/the body as acted upon paradigm that is invoked in thinking of body-technology relationships. Consequently, I argue I propose two different approaches that draw from material practices of gender and the architecture of physical computing, to offer new ways of reading the practices of policing and pathology of gender in the age of ubiquitous networking. I argue in my conclusion that ‘digital gender’ as a concept helps us build upon earlier intersections of feminist thought and practice with other identity politics by opening up to other identities of regulation and control that emerge within data regimes of information societies.
机译：在研究数字技术与性别之间的关系时，我们的论述分为两类预先确定的对策：第一组将性别视为可通过数字化实施的事物，从而产生了ICT4D和通过以下方式赋予妇女权力的言论访问数字。这也引起了DIY文化的发展，这种文化使妇女对自己的身体和自我的安全负责，并将性暴力或性虐待归咎于妇女的身体。第二套方法将数字技术作为一种处理性别的事物，研究法规和控制数字技术对女性的身体，性别和欲望的控制。它着重于网络欺凌和对妇女发动攻击的时代报复色情，隐私，保护和安全之类的做法。在这两种论述中，总是存在着两个站点之一的想象力是被动的-性别主体使用数字技术实现其意图，或者数字技术遵循算法设计的协议塑造性别主体。通过查看数字荡妇的数字，它出现在流行的文化实践和法规辩论中，表明性别意图与机器协议的这种分离并不能适应身体和技术的单调和多样化参与，从而产生有缺陷的制度有关数字性别的法规和法律。我提出了两种策略来将“数字性别”理解为一种配置瞬间，而不是一个有限的解决类别：第一种策略是将技术协议与人体的隐喻相结合，产生一种隐喻，这使我们能够超越异族。当代话语中的身体和技术生产。第二个是重新安置代理机构，并质疑作为演员的身体/根据对人体技术关系的思考所调用的范式所作用的身体。因此，我认为我提出了两种不同的方法，这些方法借鉴了性别的物质实践和物理计算的体系结构，从而提供了一种新的方式来阅读普适网络时代的警务和性别病理实践。我在结论中认为，“数字性别”作为一个概念，可以通过开放信息社会数据体制中出现的其他管制和控制身份，帮助我们建立在女权思想和实践与其他身份政治之间较早的交汇点上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号