首页> 外文期刊>Military Medical Research >A meta-analysis of the success rates of heartbeat restoration within the platinum 10?min among outpatients suffering from sudden cardiac arrest in China
【24h】

A meta-analysis of the success rates of heartbeat restoration within the platinum 10?min among outpatients suffering from sudden cardiac arrest in China

机译:对中国突发心脏骤停的门诊患者在铂金10分钟内心跳恢复成功率的荟萃分析

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundThe optimal time to save a person who has had a sudden cardiac arrest is within the first few minutes of the incident. Early compression and early defibrillation should be performed at this time. Timeliness is the key to successful CPR; as such, Prof. He proposed the “platinum 10 min” system to study early CPR issues. This paper systematically evaluates the success rates of heartbeat restoration within the “platinum 10 min” among patients suffering from sudden cardiac arrest. MethodsThe clinical data of outpatients suffering from a cardiac arrest were retrieved from the China Knowledge Network (January 1975–January 2015), the Chongqing VIP database (January 1989–January 2015), and the Wanfang database (January 1990–January 2015). The success of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed at different times after the patients had cardiac arrests was analyzed. Two researchers screened the literature and extracted the data independently. A meta-analysis was conducted using Stata12.0. A total of 57 papers met the inclusion criteria, including 29,269 patients. Of these patients, 1776 had their heartbeats successfully restored. The results showed high heterogeneity ( X 2 ?=?3428.85, P 2?=?98.4?%). The meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. The combined effect size was 0.171 (0.144–0.199). Results(1) The success rate of heartbeat restoration did not differ among the four emergency treatment methods that patients received: the methods described in the 2000 Guidelines for CPR and Emergency Cardiovascular Care, that described in the 2005 version, 2010 version, and another CPR method. (2) The patients were divided into five groups based on the time when CPR was performed: the ≤1?min group, the 1-?≤?5?min group, the 5-?≤?10?min group, the 10-?≤?15?min group and the >15?min group. The CPR success rates of these five groups were 0.247 (0.15–0.344), 0.353 (0.250–0.456), 0.136 (0.109–0.163), 0.058 (0.041–0.075), and 0.011 (0.004–0.019), respectively. The CPR success rates did not differ between the patients in the ≤1?min group and the 1-?≤?5?min group. This success rate was higher for the patients in the 1-?≤?5?min group than those in the 10-?≤?15?min group, those in the 10-?≤?15?min group, and those in the >15?min group. The CPR success rate was higher for the patients in the 5-10?min group than those in the 10-?≤?15?min group and those in the >15?min group.The CPR success rate was higher for the patients in the 10-?≤?15?min group than those in the >15?min group. In addition, the patients were divided into two groups based on whether CPR was performed within the first 10?min after the cardiac arrest occurred: the ≤10?min group and the >10?min group. The CPR success rate was higher for the patients in the ≤10?min group (0.189 [0.161–0.218]) than those in the >10?min group (0.044 [0.032–0.056]). (3) Differences were not found between the CPR success rates among the patients in the telephone guidance group (0.167 [0.016–0.351]) and those in the ≤1?min, 1-?≤?5?min, 5-?≤?10?min, 10-?≤?15?min, and >15?min groups. (4) The CPR success rates did not differ among in the patients in the witness?+?public group (0.329 [0.221–0.436]), those in the ≤1?min group, and those in the 1-?≤?5?min group. However, this success rate was higher in the patients in the witness?+?public group than those in the 5-?≤?10?min, 10-?≤?15?min, and >15?min groups. ConclusionsThe success rate of heartbeat restoration did not differ among patients receiving CPR based on different guidelines. The success rate of CPR lies in its timeliness. The participation of the general population is the cornerstone of improving CPR. Providing complete emergency treatment equipment and perfecting comprehensive measures can improve the success rate of CPR among patients within the platinum 10?min. CPR research in China must be improved.
机译:背景技术挽救心脏骤停患者的最佳时间是在事件发生的最初几分钟内。此时应进行早期压缩和早期除颤。及时性是成功进行心肺复苏的关键;因此,何教授提出了“白金10分钟”系统来研究早期的心肺复苏问题。本文系统评估了突发性心脏骤停患者在“白金10分钟”内心跳恢复的成功率。方法:从中国知识网(1975年1月至2015年1月),重庆VIP数据库(1989年1月至2015年1月)和万方数据库(1990年1月至2015年1月)中检索出患有心脏骤停的门诊患者的临床数据。分析了患者心脏骤停后不同时间进行的心肺复苏(CPR)的成功性。两名研究人员筛选了文献并独立提取了数据。使用Stata12.0进行荟萃分析。共有57篇论文符合入选标准,包括29,269名患者。在这些患者中,有1776名患者的心跳成功恢复。结果显示出高度的异质性(X 2 α=Δ3428.85,P 2 α=α98.4%)。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。组合效应大小为0.171(0.144-0.199)。结果(1)患者接受的四种紧急治疗方法中,心跳恢复的成功率没有差异:2000版《心肺复苏和心血管急救指南》中所述的方法,2005版,2010年版本中所述的方法以及另一种CPR方法。 (2)根据进行心肺复苏术的时间将患者分为五组:≤1?min组,1-?≤?5?min组,5-?≤?10?min组,10? -?≤?15?min组和> 15?min组。这五组的CPR成功率分别为0.247(0.15-0.344),0.353(0.250-0.456),0.136(0.109-0.163),0.058(0.041-0.075)和0.011(0.004-0.019)。 ≤1?min组和1?≤≤5?min组的患者的CPR成功率没有差异。 1-?≤?5?min组的成功率高于10-?≤?15?min组,10-?≤?15?min组和> 15分钟组。 5-10min组患者的CPR成功率高于10-Ω≤?15?min组和> 15?min组的患者CPR成功率。 10-?≤?15?min组要比> 15?min组要高。此外,根据是否在心跳停止后的前10分钟内进行CPR将患者分为两组:≤10分钟组和> 10分钟组。 ≤10?min组(0.189 [0.161–0.218])的患者的CPR成功率高于> 10?min组(0.044 [0.032–0.056])的患者的CPR成功率。 (3)电话指导组患者的CPR成功率(0.167 [0.016–0.351])与≤1?min,1-?≤?5?min,5-?≤的患者之间没有发现差异。每组至少10分钟,10-分钟≤15分钟和15分钟以上。 (4)证人+?公开组(0.329 [0.221–0.436]),≤1?min组和1-?≤?5患者的CPR成功率没有差异。最小组。但是,证人+“公开”组的患者的成功率要高于“5-≥≤10” min,10-≤≤15“ min”和“ 15min”组的患者。结论根据不同的指导原则,接受心肺复苏的患者心跳恢复成功率无差异。心肺复苏术的成功率在于其及时性。普通民众的参与是改善心肺复苏术的基石。提供完整的急救设备和完善的综合措施可以提高铂金10分钟以内患者的CPR成功率。中国的心肺复苏研究必须改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号