...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food: Revista Internacional de Sociologia Sobre Agricultura y Alimentos >Who Killed Rural Sociology? A Case Study in the Political Economy of Knowledge Production
【24h】

Who Killed Rural Sociology? A Case Study in the Political Economy of Knowledge Production

机译：谁杀了农村社会学？知识生产的政治经济学案例研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Rural sociology is examined as a case study in the social forces that shape and direct the production of knowledge. Knowledge production is viewed as the product of the nexus of three sets of forces. First, there are the rewards and punishments of any system of social control. While knowledge is produced under very different conditions than other commodities, concrete products (‘research’) are produced in a social milieu and in response to distinct forces. Forces that pull research in particular directions are represented by the availability of research funds and the clarity by which certain types of research are regarded as more important than others. Pushes are represented not only by the unavailability of research funds but also by discouragement of certain research trajectories. These range from friendly advice by senior faculty to graduate students, to impediments in career development, to active persecution. Second, the system of social control is embedded in an institutional network within which knowledge production occurs. Rural sociology is centrally linked to a clearly delineated institutional network composed of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the land-grant college complex. This complex constitutes a dense institutional network influencing the knowledge production system directly. Third, rural sociology is influenced by its institutional relationship to sociology as a discipline. In this case, as long as it does not involve the mission orientation of the subdiscipline (e.g. the pushes and pulls), the general discipline has effects on what can be termed the ‘autonomy’ of knowledge production within rural sociology.
机译：在塑造和指导知识生产的社会力量中，对农村社会学进行了案例研究。知识生产被认为是三组力量联系的产物。首先，任何社会控制系统都有奖惩。知识是在与其他商品完全不同的条件下生产的，而具体产品（“研究”）是在社会环境中产生的，并且是对不同力量的反应。向特定方向拉动研究的力量由研究资金的可获得性和某些类型的研究被认为比其他类型更为重要的明确性所代表。推动力不仅表现为缺乏研究资金，而且表现为对某些研究轨迹的沮丧。这些范围从高级教师到研究生的友好建议，到职业发展的障碍，到积极的迫害。其次，社会控制系统被嵌入到知识生产发生的制度网络中。农村社会学与由美国农业部和授予土地的大学综合体组成的清晰界定的机构网络紧密相连。这个复杂的系统构成了一个直接影响知识生产系统的密集机构网络。第三，农村社会学受到其与社会学作为一门学科的制度关系的影响。在这种情况下，只要不涉及子学科的任务导向（例如，推拉），一般学科都会对农村社会学中知识生产的“自主性”产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号