• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Labour / Le Travail >The Politics of the Ontario Labour Relations Act: Business, Labour, and Government in the Consolidation of Post–War Industrial Relations, 1949–1961
【24h】

The Politics of the Ontario Labour Relations Act: Business, Labour, and Government in the Consolidation of Post–War Industrial Relations, 1949–1961

机译：安大略省劳资关系法的政治：巩固战后劳资关系的商业，劳工和政府，1949-1961年

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

THE ONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS ACT (OLRA) has long dictated the legal relationship between trade unions and employers in the province. Although subject to years of delay, when the provincial government introduced the olra in 1950, its official stance on labour relations was a “hands off” program that was designed to leave collective bargaining to the participants. Often defined as industrial pluralism, this new legal regime was supposed to have been crafted in the name of “fairness and balance” in which trade unions abandoned previous militancy for state-sponsored freedoms. Upon closer examination, however, the provincial government’s approach to industrial plu ralism was much less hands off than has previously been assumed. Rather, the entrenchment of collective bargaining in Ontario was closely aligned with the class interests of Ontario businesses. Through an examination of the politics surrounding olra, this article argues that Leslie Frost’s Conservative govern ment structured the Act in order to appease employer demands surrounding increased legal regulation of collective bargaining and union organizing, which limited the extension of unionization throughout the province. In making this observation, the article maintains that the Conservative regime of industrial pluralism was both the by-product and the purveyor of ongoing class antago nism throughout the 1950s.
机译：安大略省《劳资关系法》（OLRA）长期以来规定了该省工会与雇主之间的法律关系。尽管受到了数年的拖延，但当省政府在1950年引入olra时，其对劳资关系的正式立场是一项“放任不管”计划，旨在让参与者进行集体谈判。这种新的法律制度通常被定义为工业多元化，它以“公平与平衡”的名义制定，工会在此制度下放弃了先前的好战，争取国家支持的自由。然而，经过仔细研究，省政府对工业多边主义的态度比以前设想的要容易得多。相反，在安大略省的集体谈判的牢固性与安大略省企业的阶级利益紧密相关。通过对围绕奥尔拉的政治的考察，本文认为莱斯利·弗罗斯特（Leslie Frost）的保守党政府制定了该法案，以安抚雇主对集体谈判和工会组织的法律法规日益严格的要求，这限制了工会组织在全省的扩展。在得出这一结论时，文章坚持认为，工业多元化的保守主义制度在整个1950年代既是正在进行的阶级对抗的产物，又是它的提供者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号