• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Library Leadership & Management >Professional Librarian Performance Review: A Redesign Model
【24h】

Professional Librarian Performance Review: A Redesign Model

机译：专业图书馆员绩效评估：重新设计模型

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

An innovative performance review process was imple mented at Steely Library, Northern Kentucky Univ--ersity (NKU) and can serve as a model for other academiclibraries. In response to a presidential mandate that allsalary increases be based solely upon meritorious performance, the library faculty began to build a new reviewingprocess as a basis for merit awards. In the effort to developa feasible system for ranking a growing faculty with increasingly diverse roles and responsibilities, concerns regardingconsistency in reviews rose to the forefront. The resultingsystem provides greater consistency in the reviews prepared by various supervisors, as well as an increase in thelevel and amount of professional accomplishments amongthe library faculty. Grassroots discussions, investigation,and implementation of the review structure were keys to itssuccess. The collaborative construction of peer-developedstandards provides all supervisors clear measurementsto apply. Moreover, the review process, which is usuallyclosed, is now open and transparent. All librarians knowhow merit awards are determined for themselves and theircolleagues. With this knowledge, significant improvementin the level of achievement across the faculty has beenencouraged.
机译：在北肯塔基大学（NKU）的斯蒂利图书馆（Styry Library）实施了创新的绩效评估流程，该流程可作为其他学术图书馆的模型。为了响应总统的要求，增加薪金只能基于优异的表现，图书馆教师开始建立新的审核程序，作为奖励功绩的基础。为了开发一种可行的系统，以对角色和职责日益多样化的不断发展的教师进行排名，人们对评论一致性的关注上升到了最前沿。最终的系统使各主管撰写的评论具有更大的一致性，并提高了图书馆教职员工的专业水平和水平。基层的讨论，调查和审查结构的实施是其成功的关键。同行制定标准的协作构建为所有主管提供了清晰的度量标准以供应用。而且，通常是封闭的审查过程现在是公开透明的。所有图书馆员都知道如何为自己和他们的同事颁奖。有了这些知识，就可以鼓励全体教师显着提高成就水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号