首页> 外文期刊>Romanian Journal of Biophysics >POLARIZED LIGHT VERSUS LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE ON HEALING OF CHRONIC DIABETIC FOOT ULCER
【24h】

POLARIZED LIGHT VERSUS LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE ON HEALING OF CHRONIC DIABETIC FOOT ULCER

机译:偏光与发光二极管在治疗慢性糖尿病足溃疡中的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Phototherapy is characterized by its ability to induce photobiologicalprocesses in both cellular and subcellular levels. Many studies and researches have recommended the successful application of light therapy in the management of diabetic foot ulcer, acceleration of healing rate and recovery to overcome this serious problem. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare between the effects of polarized light therapy and light-emitting diode therapy on diabetic foot ulcer. Subjects and Methods: Thirty patients of both sexes with type 2 diabetic foot ulcers participated in this study. The mean values of their ages were 59.1±7.68 and 60.9±8.3 years respectively. They were classified into two equal groups (15 patients each) PL group received polarized light therapy and LED group received non polarized light-emitting diode therapy three times per week for two months. Both groups received traditional medical treatment in addition to light therapy. Wound surface area and depth were calculated for all participated patients. These measures were recorded three times during the period of the study; before treatment, after 1 month and at the end of the study period, after two months. Results: The results of this study showed significant reduction of surface area and depth of ulcer in both groups at the end of the study period with higher improvement in favor of polarized light group. Conclusion: It was concluded that, polarized light therapy seems to be more effective in accelerating healing of grade II diabetic foot ulcer than light-emitting diode therapy.
机译:背景:光疗的特点是能够在细胞和亚细胞水平上诱导光生物学过程。许多研究和建议都建议光疗法在糖尿病足溃疡的治疗,加速治愈率和恢复方面的成功应用,以克服这一严重问题。目的:本研究的目的是比较偏光疗法和发光二极管疗法对糖尿病足溃疡的影响。研究对象和方法:30名患有2型糖尿病足溃疡的男女患者参加了这项研究。他们的平均年龄分别为59.1±7.68和60.9±8.3岁。将他们分为两组,每组15例,PL组接受偏振光治疗,LED组每周接受3次非偏振发光二极管治疗,持续两个月。两组均接受了光疗之外的传统药物治疗。计算所有参与患者的伤口表面积和深度。在研究期间,对这些措施进行了三次记录。治疗前,1个月后和研究期结束后两个月。结果:这项研究的结果显示,在研究期结束时,两组的溃疡面积和溃疡深度均显着减少,偏光组的改善更大。结论:结论是,偏振光疗法似乎比发光二极管疗法更有效地促进II级糖尿病足溃疡的愈合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号