首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Concurrent Validation of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument to the Norwich Patellar Instability Score and the Kujala Score in Patients With Patellofemoral Instability
【24h】

Concurrent Validation of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument to the Norwich Patellar Instability Score and the Kujala Score in Patients With Patellofemoral Instability

机译:同时进行Banff ella骨不稳定性检查仪对Pat股不稳定患者的Norwich ella骨不稳定性评分和Kujala评分的验证

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) is a disease-specific, patient-reported, quality-of-life outcome measure designed to assess patients with patellofemoral instability. The iterative assessment of the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a health-related patient-reported outcome measure is vital to the development of a high-quality evaluation tool. Purpose: To assess the concurrent validity of the BPII to the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score and the Kujala score. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 74 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of recurrent patellofemoral instability completed the BPII, NPI, and Kujala scores at the initial orthopaedic consultation. A Pearson r correlation coefficient was computed to determine the relationship between each of these patient-reported outcomes. Results: There were statistically significant correlations between the BPII and the NPI score ( r = ?0.53; P < .001) as well as the BPII and the Kujala score ( r = 0.50; P < .001). Conclusion: This study demonstrated a moderately strong correlation of the BPII to other outcome measures used to evaluate patients with patellofemoral instability. This study adds further validity to the BPII in accordance with the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) guidelines.
机译:背景:Banff ella骨不稳定性器械(BPII)是一种针对特定疾病的患者报告的生活质量结果指标,旨在评估assess股不稳定的患者。对与健康相关的患者报告的结局指标进行有效性,可靠性和响应性的迭代评估对于开发高质量评估工具至关重要。目的:评估BPII对Norwich Pat骨不稳定性(NPI)评分和Kujala评分的同时有效性。研究设计:队列研究;证据级别,2级。方法:总共74例经确诊为current股不稳定复发的确诊患者在最初的骨科会诊时完成了BPII,NPI和Kujala评分。计算Pearson r相关系数以确定这些患者报告的结局之间的关系。结果:BPII和NPI得分之间存在统计学显着的相关性(r = 0.53; P <.001),BPII和Kujala得分也具有统计学意义(r = 0.50; P <.001)。结论:这项研究表明BPII与其他评估em股不稳定患者的结局指标具有中等程度的相关性。根据COSMIN(基于COnsensus的健康测量仪器选择标准)指南,该研究进一步提高了BPII的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号