• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >The utility of mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: protocol for a systematic review
【24h】

The utility of mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: protocol for a systematic review

机译：微型临床评估练习（mini-CEX）在本科和研究生医学教育中的效用：系统评价的方案

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background One of the most frequently used assessment tools that measure the trainees’ performance in workplace is the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX), in which an expert observes and rates the actual performance of trainees. Several primary studies have evaluated the effectiveness of mini-CEX by assessing its educational and psychometric properties. The objective of this BEME review is to explore, analyze, and synthesize the evidence considering the utility of the mini-CEX for assessing undergraduate and postgraduate medical trainees. Methods Studies reporting on mini-CEX performed in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education and providing some empirical data for mini-CEX in relation to one or more of the validity, reliability, educational impact, acceptability, and cost of mini-CEX will be included in the review. No restrictions on study design or publication date or language will be handled. To ensure comprehensiveness of our search, we will use different approaches and methods. In addition to electronic search in bibliographic databases, we will conduct forward and backward searching. We will also contact leading authors in the field of mini-CEX and will search for the gray literature. Data extractions will be done independently by two coders based on a form. If there is any discordance, a third author will resolve it. The quality assessment will be also done independently by two team members, based on critical appraisal checklists. In attempting to answer our original research questions, we will use meta-analysis or meta-synthesis. Discussion The findings of this study can be transferred to the medical education stakeholders such as administrators of medical schools, residency program directors, and faculty members. We also hope that publication of this review will encourage stakeholders who have already adopted the mini-CEX to evaluate and report its different characteristics. Lastly, we expect that we can identify gap of knowledge in this field and suggest areas for future research.
机译：背景技术迷你临床评估练习（mini-CEX）是衡量学员在工作场所表现的最常用的评估工具之一，专家在该练习中观察并评估学员的实际表现。几项主要研究通过评估mini-CEX的教育和心理计量特性来评估其有效性。这次BEME审查的目的是考虑mini-CEX在评估本科和研究生医学实习生的效用中的作用，探索，分析和综合证据。方法包括在本科和研究生医学教育中进行的小型CEX报告研究，并提供有关小型CEX的有效性，可靠性，教育影响，可接受性和成本中的一项或多项的小型经验数据。评价。研究设计或发表日期或语言没有任何限制。为了确保我们搜索的全面性，我们将使用不同的方法和方法。除了在书目数据库中进行电子搜索外，我们还将进行正向和反向搜索。我们还将联系mini-CEX领域的主要作者，并搜索灰色文献。数据提取将由两名编码人员基于表单独立完成。如果有任何矛盾之处，第三作者将解决。质量评估也将由两个团队成员根据关键评估清单独立完成。在尝试回答我们最初的研究问题时，我们将使用荟萃分析或荟萃综合。讨论可以将本研究的结果转移给医学教育的利益相关者，例如医学院的管理人员，居住项目主管和教职员工。我们也希望本评论的发表能够鼓励已经采用mini-CEX的利益相关者评估和报告其不同的特征。最后，我们希望我们可以找出该领域的知识差距并为未来的研究提出建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号