• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>SA Journal of Industrial Psychology >A psycho-philosophical view on the ‘conceptualisation’ of psychological measure development
【24h】

A psycho-philosophical view on the ‘conceptualisation’ of psychological measure development

机译：关于心理测度发展“概念化”的一种哲学哲学观

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Orientation: ?When researchers’ understanding and application of ‘conceptualisation’ can allude to nearly anything, it loses its philosophical purpose and stature. Negating the philosophical meaning of the term ‘conceptualisation’, because it appears obvious, will result in research inquiries becoming ambiguous and ideologically diminished. Paradigms and theoretical frameworks are rooted in philosophical principles, yet researchers often ‘conceptualise’ and conduct inquiries without understanding the foundation of their applied scientific methods. Research purpose: ?The historicity of psychological measurement development depicts a fusion of transdisciplinary knowledge systems and the stature of scientific methods is comprehensive. Yet the philosophical lenses through which researchers ‘conceptualise’ their measure to understand psychological behaviour are not as clear. Motivation for the study: ?Contemporary psychometric literature postulates the ‘conceptualisation phase’ as a mere point of departure to develop a psychological measure, whereas philosophical literature depicts ‘conceptualisation’ as the mainstay of any research inquiry. Research approach/design and method: ?A qualitative design was used with the conceptual analysis of terminology as approach. Textual or typographical psychometric and psychological literature was purposively sampled and inductively and deductively analysed, using the philosophical framework of Van der Walt and Potgieter. Main findings: ?The definition of the ‘conceptualisation phase’ is principally characterised as the scientific method to measure the scientific reality, while the integral human component, represented by the measure developer, is overlooked. Practical/managerial implications: ?Insights derived can enthuse future dialogues on the purpose and importance of the conceptualisation phase in the development of psychological measures. Contribution/value-add: ?A potential delineation of what the ‘conceptualisation phase’ should encapsulate is proposed.
机译：方向：当研究人员对“概念化”的理解和应用几乎可以暗示任何东西时，它就会失去其哲学目的和地位。否定“概念化”一词的哲学含义（因为它看起来很明显），将导致研究问题变得模棱两可，意识形态上也有所减少。范式和理论框架植根于哲学原理，但是研究人员经常在不了解其应用科学方法基础的情况下“概念化”并进行询问。研究目的：心理测量发展的历史性描述了跨学科知识体系的融合，科学方法的地位是全面的。然而，研究人员通过“概念化”他们的措施来理解心理行为的哲学视角还不清楚。研究的动机：？当代心理学计量学文献将“概念化阶段”假定为发展心理测量的唯一出发点，而哲学文献则将“概念化”描述为任何研究探究的主体。研究方法/设计和方法：？使用定性设计，将术语的概念分析作为方法。目的是使用范德华特和波吉特的哲学框架，对文本或印刷心理计量学和心理学文献进行抽样，并进行归纳和演绎分析。主要发现：“概念化阶段”的定义主要是用来度量科学现实的科学方法，而忽略了由度量制定者代表的人的整体组成部分。实际/管理上的影响：？得出的见解可以激发未来关于心理阶段发展中心理概念阶段的目的和重要性的对话。贡献/增值：建议对“概念化阶段”应该封装的内容进行潜在的描述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号