首页> 外文期刊>Processes >Analysis of the Difficulties of SMEs in Industry 4.0 Applications by Analytical Hierarchy Process and Analytical Network Process
【24h】

Analysis of the Difficulties of SMEs in Industry 4.0 Applications by Analytical Hierarchy Process and Analytical Network Process

机译:层次分析法和网络分析法分析中小企业在工业4.0应用中的难点

获取原文
           

摘要

The concept of Industry 4.0 is seen as a recent paradigm in the manufacturing sector. The use of new production and management technologies required by the concept of Industry 4.0 is very important for small enterprises in order to keep up with the competition. However, most enterprises look at these requirements in a negative way. This study analyzes the propulsion forces of Industry 4.0 adopted in small and medium enterprises. By analyzing the difficulties in the transition process of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to Industry 4.0, the company contributes to the determination of strategic steps taking these results into consideration. This will facilitate the transition of enterprises to Industry 4.0 and progress can be made towards efficient use of resources. A hierarchical structure was established under the four main criteria of innovation, organization, environmental, and financial aspects, and the relative weight of these criteria and sub-criteria were calculated. The surveys conducted on business managers were evaluated using multi-criteria decision-making methods by the analytic hierarchy process method and the analytic network process. At the same time, the interaction between these criteria was taken into consideration and the criteria were re-evaluated by the analytical network process method. The results of the two methods seem to support each other.
机译:工业4.0的概念被视为制造业的最新范例。对于小型企业来说,使用工业4.0概念所需的新生产和管理技术对保持竞争非常重要。但是,大多数企业以负面的方式看待这些要求。本研究分析了中小企业采用工业4.0的推动力。通过分析中小企业(SME)向工业4.0过渡过程中的困难,该公司考虑到这些结果,为确定战略步骤做出了贡献。这将促进企业向工业4.0的过渡,并可以在有效利用资源方面取得进展。在创新,组织,环境和财务方面的四个主要标准下建立了等级结构,并计算了这些标准和子标准的相对权重。通过层次分析法和网络分析法,采用多准则决策方法对业务经理进行了调查。同时,考虑了这些标准之间的相互作用,并通过分析网络过程方法对这些标准进行了重新评估。两种方法的结果似乎相互支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号