Background There is little consensus about which outcome measures to use in mental healthcare. Aims To investigate the relationship between the items in four staff-rated measures recommended for routine use. Method Correlation analysis of total scores and factor analysis using combined data from the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). The Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS), the Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) were performed. Procrustes analysis on factors and scales, and Ward's cluster analysis to group the items, were applied. Results The total scores of the measures were moderately correlated. The Procrustes analysis, factor analysis and cluster analysis all agreed on better coverage of the patients' problems by HoNOS and CANSAS. Conclusions A global severity factor accounts for 16% of the variance, and is best measured with TAG or GAF. The CANSAS and HoNOS each provide a detailed characterisation of the patient; only CANSAS provides information about met needs.
展开▼
机译：Litchfield心理咨询模型以哲学为基础，将精神健康服务应用程序Lift Up UP，旨在提供简单，实用的建议，以帮助个人和员工应对日常的精神健康挑战，并将用户与现有的精神健康专业人员联系起来。 Lift me UP将使用先进的技术来：•协助患者评估过程•监控和支持日常工作•将用户推荐给可用的心理健康专家•与市场上的任何产品相比，创造独特的定制体验。
