• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of psychiatry : >Routine use of mental health outcome assessments: choosing the measure.
【24h】

Routine use of mental health outcome assessments: choosing the measure.

机译：常规使用心理健康结果评估：选择衡量标准。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: There is little consensus about which outcome measures to use in mental healthcare. AIMS: To investigate the relationship between the items in four staff-rated measures recommended for routine use. METHOD: Correlation analysis of total scores and factor analysis using combined data from the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). The Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS), the Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) were performed. Procrustes analysis on factors and scales, and Ward's cluster analysis to group the items, were applied. RESULTS: The total scores of the measures were moderately correlated. The Procrustes analysis, factor analysis and cluster analysis all agreed on better coverage of the patients' problems by HoNOS and CANSAS. CONCLUSIONS: A global severity factor accounts for 16% of the variance, and is best measured with TAG or GAF. The CANSAS and HoNOS each provide a detailed characterisation of the patient; only CANSAS provides information about met needs.
机译：背景：关于在心理保健中使用哪种结果指标尚无共识。目的：调查推荐用于日常工作的四项员工评级措施中各项之间的关系。方法：使用来自国家结果健康状况量表（HoNOS）的组合数据对总分进行相关性分析和因素分析。进行了坎伯韦尔需求短期评估时间表评估（CANSAS），阈值评估网格（TAG）和整体功能评估（GAF）。应用了因素和规模的前兆分析，以及将项目分组的Ward聚类分析。结果：各项措施的总分有中等程度的相关性。 Procrustes分析，因子分析和聚类分析均同意通过HoNOS和CANSAS更好地覆盖患者的问题。结论：全局严重性因素占方差的16％，最好用TAG或GAF进行测量。 CANSAS和HoNOS分别提供了患者的详细特征;只有CANSAS提供有关满足需求的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号