...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >A Roadmap for the Student Pursuing a Career in Pediatric Emergency Medicine
【24h】

A Roadmap for the Student Pursuing a Career in Pediatric Emergency Medicine

机译：学生从事儿科急诊医学职业的路线图

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Introduction: Three pathways are available to students considering a pediatric emergency medicine(PEM) career: pediatric residency followed by PEM fellowship (Peds-PEM); emergency medicineresidency followed by PEM fellowship (EM-PEM); and combined EM and pediatrics residency(EM&Peds). Questions regarding differences between the training pathways are common amongmedical students. We present a comparative analysis of training pathways highlighting majorcurricular differences to aid in students’ understanding of these training options. Methods: All currently credentialed training programs for each pathway with curricula publishedon their websites were included. We analyzed dedicated educational units (EU) core to all threepathways: emergency department (ED), pediatric-only ED, critical care, and research. Minimumrequirements for primary residencies were assumed for fellowship trainees. Results: Of the 75 Peds-PEM, 34 EM-PEM, and 4 EM&Peds programs screened, 85% of Peds-PEM and EM-PEM and all EM&Peds program curricula were available for analysis. AveragePeds-PEM EUs were 20.4 EM, 20.1 pediatric-only EM, 5.8 critical care, and 9.0 research. AverageEM-PEM EUs were 33.2 EM, 18.3 pediatric-only EM, 6.5 critical care, and 3.3 research. AverageEM&Peds EUs were 26.1 EM, 8.0 pediatric-only EM, 10.0 critical care, and 0.3 research. Conclusion: All three pathways exceed pediatric-focused training required for EM or pediatricresidency. Peds-PEM has the most research EUs, EM-PEM the most EM EUs, and EM&Pedsthe most critical care EUs. All prepare graduates for a pediatric emergency medicine career. Understanding the difference in emphasis between pathways can inform students to select the bestpathway for their own careers.
机译：简介：考虑小儿急诊医学（PEM）职业的学生可以通过三种途径：小儿住院率和PEM奖学金（Peds-PEM）; PEM奖学金（EM-PEM）之后的急诊医学住院医师;并结合了EM和儿科住院医师（EM＆Peds）。关于培训途径之间差异的问题在医学生中很常见。我们对培训途径进行了比较分析，突出了主要课程差异，以帮助学生理解这些培训方案。方法：包括所有目前通过认证的培训课程，每种课程的课程都发布在其网站上。我们分析了所有三种途径的核心教育单位（EU）：急诊科（ED），仅儿科ED，重症监护和研究。假定研究金学员的基本居住要求最低。结果：在筛选的75个Peds-PEM，34个EM-PEM和4个EM＆Peds程序中，有85％的Peds-PEM和EM-PEM以及所有EM＆Peds程序课程可供分析。 AveragePeds-PEM EUs为20.4 EM，20.1儿科专用EM，5.8重症监护和9.0研究。平均EM-PEM EUs为33.2 EM，18.3儿科专用EM，6.5重症监护和3.3研究。平均EM＆Peds EUs为26.1 EM，8.0儿科专用EM，10.0重症监护和0.3研究。结论：所有这三种途径都超过了EM或小儿住院所需的以小儿为中心的培训。 Peds-PEM拥有研究最多的欧盟，EM-PEM拥有最多的EM欧盟，而EM＆Peds拥有最重的护理欧盟。所有人都为毕业生做好了儿科急诊医学职业的准备。了解途径之间重点的不同可以使学生选择适合自己职业的最佳途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号