首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology >Limitations in the Use of the Equivalent Diameter
【24h】

Limitations in the Use of the Equivalent Diameter

机译:当量直径的使用限制

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper deals with the inaccuracy assessment of the friction pressure loss estimation based on Darcy formula combined with an equivalent hydraulic diameter and a friction factor valid for circular pipes when applied to a square rod bundle. The assessment has been done by comparing the analytical and semi-empirical predictions with two different CFD codes results: CFX and NEPTUNE_CFD. Two different analytical approaches have been considered: the whole-bundle and sub-channel approaches, both for laminar and turbulent flow conditions. Looking at results, it is reasonable to assume that an error in the range of 11% - 23% is likely when using equivalent diameter in the laminar regime. In the case of turbulent regime, the equivalent diameter works better and the error is in the range between a few percent and ~12%.
机译:本文研究了基于达西公式的摩擦压力损失估算的不准确性评估,并结合当量水力直径和适用于方管束的圆形管道有效摩擦系数。通过将分析预测和半经验预测与两个不同的CFD代码结果进行比较来完成评估:CFX和NEPTUNE_CFD。对于层流和湍流条件,已经考虑了两种不同的分析方法:全束和子通道方法。从结果看,可以合理地假设在层流状态下使用等效直径时,可能会出现11%-23%的误差。在湍流状态下,当量直径效果更好,误差在百分之几到约12%之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号