...
【24h】

Human rights and divine justice

机译:人权与神圣正义

获取原文
           

摘要

This article discusses the view of the Leiden professor Paul Cliteur that human rights are?essentially secular and require rejection of God's will as source of moral authority. Firstly,?it analyses Cliteur's reception of Kant and his claim that an exclusively anthropological?grounding of human rights is the only possible one. Next, it investigates Nicholas?Wolterstorff's criticism of Kant's grounding of human dignity in the rational capacity of?mankind and his theistic grounding of human rights in God's love by the mediating concept?of human worth. Although Wolterstorff rightly believes that God's special relationship with?human beings is ultimately the best ground for human rights, his understandings of God's?love and of human worth appear to be problematic. Finally, the article explores the possibility?to ground human rights directly in God's justice by construing creation, the giving of the Ten?Commandments and the justification of the sinner as central divine acts of justice in which?God has given human rights to all human beings.
机译:本文讨论了莱顿教授保罗·克里特尔(Paul Cliteur)的观点,即人权本质上是世俗的,需要拒绝上帝的意志作为道德权威的来源。首先,它分析了克里特尔对康德的接受,并断言了唯一的人类学对人权的基础是唯一的可能。接下来,它研究了尼古拉斯·沃尔特斯托夫对康德以人类的理性能力为基础的人的尊严的批评,以及他通过人类价值的中介概念对上帝的爱中人权的理论基础的批评。尽管沃特斯托夫正确地认为,上帝与人类的特殊关系最终是人权的最佳基础,但他对上帝的爱和人类价值的理解似乎存在问题。最后,本文探讨了以下可能性:通过将创造,十诫的发出以及罪人的正当性解释为上帝神圣的正义行为,上帝将人权赋予了所有人,从而将人权直接置于上帝的正义中众生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号