...
首页> 外文期刊>Humanities >The (de)Militarization of Humanitarian Aid: A Historical Perspective
【24h】

The (de)Militarization of Humanitarian Aid: A Historical Perspective

机译:人道主义援助的(非)军事化:历史的视角

获取原文
           

摘要

Humanitarian workers often complain that international aid to victims of armed conflicts is more and more militarized because relief organizations are embedded into peacekeeping operations, used as a “force multiplier”, or manipulated as an instrument of diplomacy by proxy. Historically, however, charity has always been a military issue in times of war. We can distinguish four types of militarization of relief organizations in this regard. First is the use of charities to make “war by proxy”, as in Afghanistan or Nicaragua in the 1980s. The second pattern is “embedment”, like the Red Cross during the two world wars. The third is “self-defense”, as with the Order of Saint John of Jerusalem (now Malta) in the 12th Century. The fourth, finally, is the model of “International Brigades” alongside the Spanish Republicans in 1936 or various liberation movements in the 1970s. In comparison, humanitarian aid today appears to be much less militarized. However, this perception also depends on the various definitions of the word “humanitarian”.
机译:人道主义工作者经常抱怨说,向武装冲突受难者提供的国际援助越来越军事化,因为救援组织已被纳入维和行动中,被用作“力量倍增器”,或被代理人用作外交手段。但是,从历史上看,慈善在战争时期一直是军事问题。在这方面,我们可以区分四种类型的救济组织军事化。首先是利用慈善组织进行“代理战争”,例如1980年代的阿富汗或尼加拉瓜。第二种模式是“嵌入”,就像两次世界大战期间的红十字会一样。第三是“自卫”,就像十二世纪的耶路撒冷圣约翰勋章(现为马耳他)一样。最后,第四个模型是1936年与西班牙共和党并驾齐驱的“国际旅”的模型,或者是1970年代的各种解放运动的模型。相比之下,今天的人道主义援助似乎没有那么军事化。但是,这种认识还取决于“人道主义”一词的各种定义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号