• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Disasters >‘A tradition of forgetting’: stabilisation and humanitarian action in historical perspective
【24h】

‘A tradition of forgetting’: stabilisation and humanitarian action in historical perspective

机译：“遗忘的传统”：历史角度的稳定与人道主义行动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

While subject to increasing articulation and institutionalisation, stabilisation is a long-standing concept and practice that has consistently engaged with and, at times, conflicted with varied understandings of humanitarianism and humanitarian action. Reviewing selected historical experiences, including the Philippines (1898–1902), Algeria (1956–62), Vietnam (1967–75) and El Salvador (1980–92), this paper argues that contemporary models of stabilisation build on and repeat mistakes of the past, particularly the overt securitisation of aid and the perception that humanitarian and development actors are able to purchase security effectively. Where current stabilisation differs from its earlier incarnations, as in the introduction of the private sector and incorporation of humanitarian action into war-fighting strategies, the implications are shown to be troubling if not outright disastrous. T his examination of historical experience, which includes many failures and few, if any, successes, raises the likelihood that it is not solely the design or implementation of individual stability operations that require modification but perhaps the entire concept of stabilisation itself.
机译：稳定虽然受到越来越多的关注和制度化的影响，但它是一种长期的概念和做法，一直与各种对人道主义和人道主义行动的理解保持一致，有时甚至相互冲突。回顾选定的历史经验，包括菲律宾（1898–1902），阿尔及利亚（1956–62），越南（1967–75）和萨尔瓦多（1980–92），本文认为当代的稳定模式建立在并重复了各国的错误上。过去，尤其是公开的援助证券化，以及人们认为人道主义和发展行为体能够有效购买安全的观念。当前的稳定与其先前的化身不同，例如在引入私营部门并将人道主义行动纳入战争战略中时，所显示的影响令人担忧，即使不是完全灾难性的。对历史经验的考察包括许多失败和很少（如果有的话）成功，这增加了这样的可能性，即不仅需要修改个人稳定操作的设计或实施，而且需要稳定本身的整个概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号