• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies >Land and identity in South Africa: An immanent moral critique of dominant discourses in the debate on expropriation without compensation
【24h】

Land and identity in South Africa: An immanent moral critique of dominant discourses in the debate on expropriation without compensation

机译：南非的土地与身份：在关于无偿没收的辩论中对主流话语的内在道德批判

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Ownership is an important identity marker. It provides people with a sense of autonomy, rootedness and opportunity. This essay examines the oral submissions of civil organisations to the Joint Constitutional Review Committee (04–07 September 2018) about the issue of land expropriation without compensation. The discussion pays specific attention to the philosophical understandings of land and identity that emerged during the hearings. Three dominant trajectories came into play, namely land as commodity, land as social space and land as spiritual inheritance. Some submissions espoused more than one view, which indicates that the boundaries between the identified paradigms are permeable. However, even those presentations tended to prioritise one approach above the others. Besides identifying the main approaches to land and identity, this essay also provides an immanent critique of their moral assumptions. In contrast to a transcendental approach, an immanent critique asks questions from ‘within’ and evaluates paradigms in terms of their plausibility, universal applicability, ethical consistency and moral integrity.
机译：所有权是重要的身份标志。它给人们以自治，生根和机会的感觉。本文研究了民间组织就联合王国宪法审查委员会（2018年9月4日至7日）所作的关于无偿征地问题的口头陈述。讨论特别关注听证会期间对土地和身份的哲学理解。三个主要轨迹开始起作用，即以土地为商品，以土地为社会空间和以土地为精神遗产。一些意见书支持一种以上的观点，这表明所确定的范式之间的边界是可渗透的。但是，即使是那些演示文稿也倾向于优先考虑一种方法。除了确定有关土地和身份的主要方法外，本文还对他们的道德假设提出了内在的批评。与先验的方法相比，内在的批判从“内部”提出问题，并根据其合理性，普遍适用性，道德一致性和道德完整性评价范式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号