...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>HYDRO Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment >How Movements Move? Evaluating the Role of Ideology and Leadership in Environmental Movement Dynamics in India with Special Reference to the Narmada Bachao Andolan
【24h】

How Movements Move? Evaluating the Role of Ideology and Leadership in Environmental Movement Dynamics in India with Special Reference to the Narmada Bachao Andolan

机译：动作如何运动？评估意识形态和领导力在印度环境运动动态中的作用，特别参考Narmada Bachao Andolan

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Lawrence Cox (1999) has argued that the established perspectives on social movements operate with an inadequately narrow conception of the ‘object’ that is being studied and thus tends to ‘reify’ “movements” as usual activity against essentially static backgrounds, and in its place, he advocates a concept of social movement as the more or less developed articulation of situated rationalities. Following Cox, therefore, the present study perceives social movements as articulations of situated rationalities by perceiving them as a tactical, dialectical response to the harsh realities of the political system. This would help us capture the essential dynamic and transformative aspects of the movement. Any social movement, and for that matter, environmental movements are characterized by the presence of agencies and structural components, which, however, are not a priori and static. They are rather dynamic and get changed and transformed in the course of the movement. Precisely for this reason, the environmental movements can at best be comprehended by way of locating and analyzing the dynamism and transformations of the movements produced by the dialectical interaction of the various components and parameters of the movement over a span of time. Hence, the present paper aims to evaluate the dynamics and transformations of the environmental movements in India, taking the case of the Narmada Bachao Andolan, and, adopting a strategic relational approach within the agent-structure framework as its framework of analysis. For the present purpose, however, we have taken only two variables, namely, Ideology and Leadership and attempted the analysis of their contributions in producing movement dynamics. Hydro Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment Issue No. 4, January, 2009 Page 24-29
机译：劳伦斯·考克斯（Lawrence Cox（1999））认为，关于社会运动的既定观点在研究的“对象”概念范围不够狭窄的情况下运作，因此倾向于在​​本质上是静态的背景下以及在其静态背景下将“运动”作为常规活动进行“验证”。在这个地方，他提倡社会运动的概念，即或多或少地发展了情境理性。因此，继考克斯之后，本研究通过将社会运动视为对政治制度的严峻现实的战术，辩证反应，将其视为对处境理性的清晰表达。这将有助于我们掌握运动的基本动态和变革方面。任何社会运动，就此而言，环境运动的特征都是机构和结构性要素的存在，然而，这些要素和结构性要素并不是先验和静态的。它们是动态的，在运动过程中会发生变化和变化。正是由于这个原因，环境运动最多可以通过定位和分析运动的动力和变化来理解，运动是由运动的各个组成部分和参数在整个时间范围内的辩证相互作用而产生的。因此，本文旨在以Narmada Bachao Andolan为例，并在代理结构框架内采用战略关系方法作为分析框架，以评估印度环境运动的动态和变化。但是，出于目前的目的，我们仅采用了两个变量，即意识形态和领导力，并试图分析它们在产生运动动力方面的贡献。尼泊尔水电：《水，能源与环境学报》第4期，2009年1月，第24-29页

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号