...
首页> 外文期刊>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies >Dualistiese antropologie by Paulus?
【24h】

Dualistiese antropologie by Paulus?

机译:保罗的二元人类学?

获取原文
           

摘要

Dualistic anthropology in Paul? The question as to whether Paul's anthropology can be qualified as dualistic is, with a few exceptions, usually answered in the negative. However, although the vast majority of scholars favour the negative answer, it cannot be denied that there are instances in the Pauline correspondence which are suspect, to say the least. It is for this reason that the debate has not come to a rest yet, and that the issue is still raised from time to time. The present study was prompted by recent contributions to the debate, especially those of Boyarin (1994) and Crossan (1998), in which it is claimed that Paul's anthropology can indeed be qualified as dualistic. The outcome of the study is that one has every reason to believe that in a number of passages Paul not only made use of dualistic terminology and concepts, but that he actually also conceived of human existence in a dualistic manner.
机译:保罗的二元人类学?关于保罗的人类学是否可以被视为二元论的问题,除了少数例外,通常被否定地回答。但是,尽管绝大多数学者赞成否定答案,但至少可以说,可以肯定的是,宝琳书信中存在一些可疑的例子。出于这个原因,辩论还没有结束,这个问题仍然时有发生。本研究是由于最近对辩论的贡献而引起的,特别是博亚林(1994)和克罗斯(1998)的辩论,其中声称保罗的人类学确实可以被视为二元论。研究的结果是,人们有充分的理由相信,保罗在许多段落中不仅使用了二元论的术语和概念,而且实际上还以二元论的方式设想了人类的存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号