• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Hong Kong medical journal = >Factors affecting implementation of accreditation programmes and the impact of the accreditation process on quality improvement in hospitals: a SWOT analysis
【24h】

Factors affecting implementation of accreditation programmes and the impact of the accreditation process on quality improvement in hospitals: a SWOT analysis

机译：影响实施认证计划的因素以及认证过程对医院质量改善的影响：SWOT分析

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Hong Kong Med J 2013;19:434–46?| Number 5, October 2013 DOI: 10.12809/hkmj134063 REVIEW ARTICLE Factors affecting implementation of accreditation programmes and the impact of the accreditation process on quality improvement in hospitals: a SWOT analysis Gloria KB Ng, Gilberto KK Leung, Janice M Johnston, Benjamin J Cowling Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Full paper in PDF OBJECTIVES. The objectives of this review were to identify factors that influence implementation of hospital accreditation programmes and to assess the impact of the accreditation process on quality improvement in public hospitals. DATA SOURCES. Two electronic databases, Medline (OvidSP) and PubMed, were systematically searched. STUDY SELECTION. "Public hospital", "hospital accreditation", and "quality improvement" were used as the search terms. A total of 348 citations were initially identified. After critical appraisal and study selection, 26 articles were included in the review. DATA EXTRACTION. The data were extracted and analysed using a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS. Increased staff engagement and communication, multidisciplinary team building, positive changes in organisational culture, and enhanced leadership and staff awareness of continuous quality improvement were identified as strengths. Weaknesses included organisational resistance to change, increased staff workload, lack of awareness about continuous quality improvement, insufficient staff training and support for continuous quality improvement, lack of applicable accreditation standards for local use, and lack of performance outcome measures. Opportunities included identification of improvement areas, enhanced patient safety, additional funding, public recognition, and market advantage. Threats included opportunistic behaviours, funding cuts, lack of incentives for participation, and a regulatory approach to mandatory participation. CONCLUSIONS. By relating the findings to the operational issues of accreditation, this review discussed the implications for successful implementation and how accreditation may drive quality improvement. These findings have implications for various stakeholders (government, the public, patients and health care providers), when it comes to embarking on accreditation exercises. Key words: Accreditation; Hospitals, public; Quality improvement View this abstract indexed in MEDLINE:
机译：香港医学杂志2013; 19：434–46？|第5号，2013年10月DOI：10.12809 / hkmj134063评论文章影响实施认证计划的因素以及认证过程对医院质量改善的影响：SWOT分析Gloria KB Ng，Gilberto KK Leung，Janice M Johnston，Benjamin J Cowling Department香港大学，薄扶林，玛丽医院，香港大学外科系，全文PDF格式。此次审查的目的是确定影响医院认证计划实施的因素，并评估认证过程对公立医院质量改善的影响。数据源。系统搜索了两个电子数据库Medline（OvidSP）和PubMed。研究选择。使用“公立医院”，“医院认证”和“质量改善”作为搜索词。最初确定了348个引用。经过严格的评估和研究选择后，本评价纳入了26篇文章。数据提取。使用SWOT（优势，劣势，机会，威胁）分析来提取和分析数据。数据综合。增强的员工敬业度和沟通能力，跨学科的团队建设，组织文化的积极变化以及增强的领导能力和员工对持续质量改进的意识被认为是优势。劣势包括组织对变革的抵制，工作人员工作量增加，对持续质量改进的意识不足，员工培训不足和对持续质量改进的支持，缺乏适用于本地使用的认可标准以及缺乏绩效结果措施。机会包括确定需要改进的领域，提高患者安全性，增加资金，公众认可和市场优势。威胁包括机会主义行为，资金削减，缺乏参与激励措施以及强制性参与的监管方法。结论。通过将调查结果与认可的操作问题联系起来，本次审查讨论了成功实施的意义以及认可如何推动质量改进。在开展认证活动时，这些发现对各个利益相关者（政府，公众，患者和医疗保健提供者）都有影响。关键字：认证;公共医院;质量改进查看在MEDLINE中建立索引的摘要：

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号