首页> 外文期刊>Journal of athletic training >Sex and Employment-Setting Differences in Work-Family Conflict in Athletic Training
【24h】

Sex and Employment-Setting Differences in Work-Family Conflict in Athletic Training

机译:运动训练中工作家庭冲突中的性别和就业设置差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: Work-family conflict (WFC) has received much attention in athletic training, yet several factors related to this phenomenon have not been examined, specifically a practitioner's sex, occupational setting, willingness to leave the profession, and willingness to use work-leave benefits. Objective: To examine how sex and occupational differences in athletic training affect WFC and to examine willingness to leave the profession and use work-leave benefits. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Multiple occupational settings, including clinic/outreach, education, collegiate, industrial, professional sports, secondary school, and sales. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 246 athletic trainers (ATs) (men = 110, women = 136) participated. Of these, 61.4% (n = 151) were between 20 and 39 years old. Main Outcome Measures(s): Participants responded to a previously validated and reliable WFC instrument. We created and validated a 3-item instrument that assessed willingness to use work-leave benefits, which demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.88), as well as a single question about willingness to leave the profession. Results: The mean (± SD) WFC score was 16.88 ± 4.4 (range = 5 [least amount of conflict] to 25 [highest amount of conflict]). Men scored 17.01 ± 4.5, and women scored 16.76 ± 4.36, indicating above-average WFC. We observed no difference between men and women based on conflict scores (t244 = 0.492, P = .95) or their willingness to leave the profession (t244 = ?1.27, P = .21). We noted differences among ATs in different practice settings (F8,245 = 5.015, P <.001); those in collegiate and secondary school settings had higher reported WFC scores. A negative relationship existed between WFC score and comfort using work-leave benefits (2-tailed r = ?0.533, P < .001). Comfort with using work-leave benefits was different among practice settings (F8,245 = 3.01, P = .003). Conclusions: The ATs employed in traditional practice settings reported higher levels of WFC. Male and female ATs had comparable experiences of WFC and willingness to leave the profession.
机译:背景:在体育训练中,工作家庭冲突(WFC)已引起广泛关注,但尚未检查与该现象相关的几个因素,特别是从业者的性别,职业环境,离开该行业的意愿以及使用工作假期的意愿。好处。目的:研究运动训练中的性别和职业差异如何影响WFC,并研究退出职业并使用工作假期福利的意愿。设计:横断面研究。机构:多种职业机构,包括诊所/外展,教育,大学,工业,专业体育,中学和销售。患者或其他参与者:总共246名运动教练(AT)(男性= 110,女性= 136)参加了比赛。其中61.4%(n = 151)在20至39岁之间。主要成果指标:参与者对之前已通过验证且可靠的WFC仪器做出了回应。我们创建并验证了一项3项工具,该工具评估了使用工作假期福利的意愿,这显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbachα= 0.88),以及有关离开该行业的意愿的单个问题。结果:WFC的平均得分(±SD)为16.88±4.4(范围= 5 [最小冲突量]至25 [最大冲突量])。男性得分为17.01±4.5,女性得分为16.76±4.36,表明WFC高于平均水平。根据冲突分数(t244 = 0.492,P = 0.95)或他们离开专业的意愿(t244 =?1.27,P = 0.21),我们没有观察到男女之间的差异。我们注意到不同练习环境中AT之间的差异(F8,245 = 5.015,P <.001);在大学和中学阶段的学生报告的WFC分数更高。 WFC评分与使用工作休假福利的舒适度之间存在负相关关系(2尾r = 0.533,P <0.001)。在实践中,使用休假福利的舒适性有所不同(F8,245 = 3.01,P = .003)。结论:在传统实践环境中使用的AT报告了更高的WFC水平。男性和女性AT拥有类似的WFC经验,并且愿意离开该行业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号