...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Life Sciences International >Dengue and Mosquito Control Programs: A Comparative Analysis
【24h】

Dengue and Mosquito Control Programs: A Comparative Analysis

机译：登革热和蚊子控制程序：对比分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Aims: This paper aims to compare the effectiveness of current mosquito control programs in the control of dengue in a developed versus a developing country. Study Design: Systematic Review and Analysis. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Global Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA between August 2013 and July 2014. Methodology: Systematic literature search of published and grey literature was done using the following databases: MEDLINE, AGRICOLA, BMC, DOAJ, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, WHOLIS and Google Scholar. Relevant data were then extracted and analyzed. Results: Developing countries usually start up vector control activities after an epidemic has started, resulting in a lower impact on the control and prevention of dengue. Some developing countries, despite having sustainable vector control programs, still have a high incidence of dengue. Some studies have shown that factors such as defective urban planning, low socio-economic status and poor physical housing conditions in some endemic locations within the developing countries may account for the high incidence of dengue cases. In comparison, a developed country with robust mosquito control programs that have been sustained over long period of time, with proper ongoing surveillance involving monitoring and evaluation, better economy, urban planning and human behavior, consistently present with low incidence of dengue infection within the past few years. Conclusion: There are existing deficiencies in dengue vector control in developing countries such as gaps in the practice or implementation of vector control programs and existence of a sustainable mosquito control program. Further research needs to be done to determine the reasons for these gaps. Interventions need to be directed towards eliminating these gaps in dengue vector control to reduce incidence in these populations and prevent epidemics. Interventions may need to focus on policies regarding urban planning and educating the population on better practices regarding human behavior and habitation. Disclaimer: The authors are not implying that one of the mosquito control programs being compared is superior to the other; this is simply a comparative analysis of two programs which may or may not represent standard practices of other developed and developing countries.
机译：目的：本文旨在比较目前的蚊子控制计划在发达国家和发展中国家在控制登革热方面的有效性。研究设计：系统的审查和分析。研究地点和时间：2013年8月至2014年7月，美国佛罗里达州坦帕市，南佛罗里达大学全球卫生系。方法：使用以下数据库进行系统的文献检索公开和灰色文献检索：MEDLINE，AGRICOLA，BMC ，DOAJ，Web of Science，Cochrane图书馆，WHOLIS和Google Scholar。然后提取和分析相关数据。结果：发展中国家通常在疫情开始后就开始病媒控制活动，从而对登革热的控制和预防产生较小的影响。一些发展中国家尽管制定了可持续的病媒控制计划，但登革热的发病率仍然很高。一些研究表明，诸如城市规划不完善，社会经济地位低下以及发展中国家某些流行地区的实际住房条件差等因素可能是造成登革热病例高发的原因。相比之下，一个发达国家拥有长期有效的灭蚊计划，并进行了适当的持续监测，包括监测和评估，更好的经济，城市规划和人类行为，过去一直以来登革热感染率一直较低数年。结论：发展中国家在登革热媒介控制方面存在缺陷，例如媒介控制方案的实践或实施方面的差距以及可持续蚊子控制计划的存在。需要做进一步的研究以确定这些差距的原因。需要采取干预措施来消除登革热媒介控制方面的这些差距，以减少这些人群的发病率并预防流行病。干预措施可能需要重点关注有关城市规划的政策，并就有关人类行为和居住环境的更好做法对民众进行教育。免责声明：作者并没有暗示正在比较的一种蚊子控制程序要优于另一种。这仅仅是对两个方案的比较分析，这两个方案可能代表也可能不代表其他发达国家和发展中国家的标准做法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号