...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research >Proarrhythmic Characteristics of Automated Implantable Cardioverter Defi brillators
【24h】

Proarrhythmic Characteristics of Automated Implantable Cardioverter Defi brillators

机译:自动植入式心脏复律除颤器的心律失常特征

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Automated implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) interventions have the potential to be proarrhythmogenic. This is related to suboptimal programming and technical limitations of the device. We sought to categorize the stored events in Boston Scientifi c Latitude remote monitoring system to appropriate and inappropriate shocks and identify the proarrhythmic event. Methods: Currently patients with an AICD are monitored and stored remotely. We reviewed the Boston Scientifi c Latitude database for stored events and categorized them. Shocks delivered for deleterious arrhythmias (ventricular fi brillation) were considered appropriate. Shocks delivered for relatively benign arrhythmias (exsinus tachycardia treated with anti-tachycardic pacing) were considered inappropriate. Worsening of baseline arrhythmia secondary to implantable cardioverter-defi brillator treatment is considered proarrhythmic (ex-sustained ventricular tachycardia [VT] treated with shock resulting in ventricular fi brillation). Results: Of the 3049 stored events, 380 shock events were identifi ed. Among them, 132 events were induced during AICD implantation for testing purposes and thus excluded. One hundred and eighty were considered appropriate as the device shocked them out of sustained VT. Nine events were considered appropriate and proarrhythmic. Fifty-fi ve were considered inappropriate as the shock was delivered for supraventricular arrhythmia. Four events were considered inappropriate and proarrhythmic as the AICD shocked the clinically inappropriate rhythm resulting in worsening of arrhythmia. Conclusion: We noted 13 proarrhythmic events. Most of them are due to inadvertent recognition of supraventricular arrhythmia and delivering of therapies. Proarrhythmogenicity can be minimized by careful programming of the AICD.
机译:简介:自动化植入式心脏复律除颤器(AICD)可能会导致心律失常。这与设备的次优编程和技术限制有关。我们试图将波士顿科学纬度远程监控系统中存储的事件分类为适当和不适当的电击,并确定心律失常事件。方法:目前,对具有AICD的患者进行远程监视和存储。我们检查了波士顿科学纬度数据库中存储的事件,并对其进行了分类。造成有害的心律失常(心室纤颤)的电击被认为是适当的。对于相对良性心律不齐(使用抗心动过速起搏治疗的Exsinus速动)进行电击被认为是不合适的。植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗后继发的基线心律不齐恶化被认为是心律失常性(过度持续的室速过速(VT),经休克治疗导致心室纤颤)。结果:在存储的3049个事件中,识别出380个电击事件。其中,出于测试目的,在AICD植入过程中诱发了132个事件,因此将其排除在外。一百八十被认为是合适的,因为该设备使他们摆脱了持续性室速。九个事件被认为是适当的和心律失常的。五十五岁被认为是不合适的,因为电击是为室上性心律失常而提供的。由于AICD震惊了临床上不适当的节律,导致心律不齐恶化,因此有4个事件被认为是不适当的和心律失常的。结论:我们注意到了13个心律失常事件。它们中的大多数归因于对室上性心律失常的误认和治疗的提供。通过精心设计AICD可以使心律失常性降至最低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号