...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Eating Disorders >Test-retest reliability of the eating disorder examination-questionnaire (EDE-Q) in a college sample
【24h】

Test-retest reliability of the eating disorder examination-questionnaire (EDE-Q) in a college sample

机译:饮食失调问卷(EDE-Q)在大学样本中的重测信度

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundThe Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), a widely used self-report instrument, is often used for measuring change in eating disorder symptoms over the course of treatment. However, limited data exist about test-retest reliability, particularly for men. The current study evaluated EDE-Q 7-day test-retest reliability in male (n?=?47) and female (n?=?44) undergraduate students together and separately by gender. ResultsInternal consistency was consistently higher for women and at Time 2, but remained acceptable for both men and women at both time points. Cronbach’s α ranged from .75 (Restraint at Time 1) to .93 (Shape Concern at Time 2) for women and from .73 (Eating Concern at Time 2) to .89 (Shape Concern at Time 2) for men. With the exception of some of the eating disorder behaviors, test re-test reliability was fairly strong for both men and women. Shape Concern and the global EDE-Q score were highest for both men and women (Spearman’s rho?>?0.89 with the exception of Shape Concern for women for which Spearman’s rho?=?.86). Test re-test reliability was lower for the eating disorder behavior measures, particularly for men, for whom Kendall’s tau-b for frequency and phi for occurrence was less than 0.70 for all but objective bulimic episodes. ConclusionsResults were consistent with past research for women, indicating strong test re-test reliability in attitudinal features of eating disorders, but lower test re-test reliability in behavioral features. Internal consistency and test re-test reliability was good for the attitudinal features of eating disorder in men, but tended to be lower for men compared to women. The EDE-Q appears to be a reliable instrument for assessing eating disorder attitudes in both male and female undergraduate students, but is less reliable for assessing ED behaviors, particularly in men.
机译:背景技术饮食失调调查问卷(EDE-Q)是一种广泛使用的自我报告工具,通常用于测量在治疗过程中饮食失调症状的变化。但是,关于重测可靠性的数据有限,尤其是对于男性而言。本研究评估了男(n?=?47)和女(n?=?44)本科生的EDE-Q 7天重测信度,并按性别分别进行了评估。结果女性的内部一致性在时间2一直较高,但是在两个时间点上男性和女性仍然可以接受。女性的Cronbachα值范围为.75(在时间1时为限制)到.93(在时间2中为形状关注),而对于男性,则为.73(在时间2饮食方面)至0.89(在时间2中关注形状)。除某些饮食失调行为外,男女的测验重测信度都相当强。男性和女性的Shape Concern和整体EDE-Q得分最高(Spearman的rho?>?0.89,但Spearman的rho?= ?. 86的女性的Shape Concern除外)。对于饮食失调行为指标,测试重新测试的信度较低,特别是对于男性,肯德尔的tau-b发生频率和phi发生率(除客观暴食事件外)均低于0.70。结论结果与以往对女性的研究一致,表明饮食失调的态度特征的重测信度强,而行为特征的重测信度低。内部一致性和重测信度对于男性饮食失调的态度特征是好的,但是男性相比女性要低。 EDE-Q似乎是评估男女大学生饮食失调态度的可靠工具,但对于评估ED行为(尤其是男性)的可靠性较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号