首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Humanitarian Action >Getting relief to marginalised minorities: the response to cyclone Komen in 2015 in Myanmar
【24h】

Getting relief to marginalised minorities: the response to cyclone Komen in 2015 in Myanmar

机译:为边缘化少数民族提供救济:2015年缅甸对科门飓风的应对

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Little academic research has examined the challenges humanitarian actors face or the strategies they develop in the increasingly numerous authoritarian and low-intensity conflict settings. Based on 4?months of qualitative fieldwork in Myanmar in 2017–2018, this article explores how civil society organisations, international non-governmental organisations, international organisations, and donor agencies tried to provide relief to marginalised minorities in the ethnic States of Chin and Rakhine following Cyclone Komen in 2015. The study findings detail how civil society actors mobilised parallel minority and Christian networks and lobbied international actors to support disaster victims of Chin ethnicity. In Rakhine State, it was overwhelmingly international humanitarians who were able and willing to support Muslims, including the Rohingya. This increased tensions among community groups and between Myanmar and the international community. Particularly in the context of rising identity politics, humanitarian governance encompasses the governance of perceptions. Trade-offs between long-term acceptance and following humanitarian principles in aid allocation are largely unavoidable and must be carefully considered.
机译:摘要很少有学术研究研究人道主义行动者面临的挑战或他们在越来越多的专制和低强度冲突环境中制定的策略。基于2017-2018年在缅甸进行的4个月定性实地考察,本文探讨了民间社会组织,国际非政府组织,国际组织和捐助机构如何努力为钦邦和若开邦的边际少数民族提供救济继2015年飓风“科门”之后。该研究结果详细介绍了民间社会行动者如何动员平行的少数民族和基督教网络,并游说国际行动者来支持钦族的灾民。在若开邦,绝大多数国际人道主义人员能够并且愿意支持包括罗兴亚在内的穆斯林。这加剧了社区团体之间以及缅甸与国际社会之间的紧张关系。特别是在身份政治上升的背景下,人道主义治理涵盖了观念的治理。在援助分配中长期接受和遵循人道主义原则之间的取舍在很大程度上是不可避免的,必须仔细考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号