Blending Postmodernism with Military Design Methodologies: Heresy, Subversion, and other Myths of Organizational Change

Ben Zweibelson

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Military and Strategic Studies >Blending Postmodernism with Military Design Methodologies: Heresy, Subversion, and other Myths of Organizational Change

【24h】

Blending Postmodernism with Military Design Methodologies: Heresy, Subversion, and other Myths of Organizational Change

机译：将后现代主义与军事设计方法融合：异端，颠覆和组织变革的其他神话

获取原文

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The emergence of postmodern thinking in 21st century military practice, theory, and education is apparent through various international Armed Forces research, debate, and professional development. However, there is yet to exist a single overarching or agreed upon form for a postmodern military methodology, with extensive disagreement over language, form, function, and practical application in war. This essay frames the current debate by proposing an emergent movement termed the ‘postmodern military movement’ that is in conflict with the existing ‘modernist military movement’ well entrenched in most Anglo-Saxon Armed Forces. More significantly, the military appropriation of postmodern social theory invokes subsequent questions of whether the military might forge novel war applications that redefine the larger postmodern movement, or if it will remain untouched. This essay describes the current competing design theories as well as the personal journey of the author as he contributes his own military research and experimentation into the larger military profession for institutional debate and self-reflection.

机译：通过各种国际武装部队的研究，辩论和专业发展，可以明显看出后现代思想在21世纪军事实践，理论和教育中的出现。但是，对于后现代军事方法论，还没有一个单一的总体形式或商定的形式，在战争中的语言，形式，功能和实际应用上存在广泛分歧。本文通过提出一种称为“后现代军事运动”的新兴运动来框架当前的辩论，该运动与大多数盎格鲁-撒克逊武装部队中根深蒂固的现有“现代主义军事运动”相抵触。更重要的是，对后现代社会理论的军事拨款引发了随后的问题，即军方是否会伪造重新定义更大的后现代运动的新颖的战争应用，或者是否保持不变。本文描述了当前竞争的设计理论以及作者的个人历程，因为他将自己的军事研究和实验贡献给更大的军事专业，以进行机构辩论和自我反思。

著录项

来源
《Journal of Military and Strategic Studies》 |2017年第4期|共26页
作者
Ben Zweibelson;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类军事;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. A design-oriented approach to organizational change: insights from a military case study [J] . Pierre Barbaroux Journal of organizational change management . 2011,第5期

机译：面向设计的组织变革方法：军事案例研究的见解
2. Organizational ethnography and methodological angst: myths and challenges in the field [J] . Dvora Yanow Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal . 2009,第2期

机译：组织人种志和方法论焦虑：该领域的神话与挑战
3. Public Sector Shared Services and the Lean Methodology: Implications on Military Organizations [J] . Costa Renato, Resende Tiago, Dias Alvaro, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity . 2020,第3期

机译：公共部门共享服务和精益方法：对军事组织的影响
4. The problem of changing values in managerial development through open education and distance learning programs for the organizational postmodernity [C] . Vargas Hernandez, J.G. . 2001

机译：通过开放教育和远程学习计划为组织后现代性改变管理发展中的价值观的问题
5. The effects of change in the transition from traditional training methods to training delivered by technological methods on military and civilian education and training specialists in selected military training organizations. [D] . Durica, Rosemary A. 1999

机译：从传统的培训方法过渡到以技术方法进行的培训对某些军事培训组织中的军事和民用教育及培训专家的影响。
6. A Comparison between Several Response Surface Methodology Designs and a Neural Network Model to Optimise the Oxidation Conditions of a Lignocellulosic Blend [O] . Roberto López, Camino Fernández, Fernando J. Pereira, 2020

机译：几种响应面方法学设计与优化木质纤维素混合物氧化条件的神经网络模型之间的比较
7. Encouraging moral military behaviour through the infrastructural design of the military organization : the awkward psychological realm of the military profession and organization [O] . Gulpers L.G. 2010

机译：通过军事组织的基础设施设计鼓励道德军事行为：军事职业和组织的尴尬心理境界

Blending Postmodernism with Military Design Methodologies: Heresy, Subversion, and other Myths of Organizational Change

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅