首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neuroscience and Behavioral Health >Effect of interaction between eye-hand dominance on dart skill
【24h】

Effect of interaction between eye-hand dominance on dart skill

机译:眼手优势之间的相互作用对飞镖技巧的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

The purpose of this research was surveying the effect of interaction between eye hand dominance on dart skill. Twenty healthy male subjects (age: 21.43±1.33) from University of Shahid Chamran were served as the participants for this study. Subjects were divided into two groups: unilateral (right eye and right hand or left eye and left hand) group (10 subjects) and cross lateral (right eye and left hand or left eye and right hand) group (10 subjects). Each group trained for 12 sessions in the same condition. The acquisition test was made after?the last training session and the retention test was made 1 week later. The scores of pre-test, acquisition and retention were recorded.?Subjects threw 60 darts in each training session. Porta (Roth, 2002) and Hole in the card test (Sage, 1984) was used to select eye dominance and Edinburgh questionnaire (Oldfield, 1971) was used to determine handedness. Values of p<0.05 were chosen as significant. The results of dependent t-test (paired t-test) analysis showed that there was a significant difference between the pre-test, acquisition and retention between two groups that showed both groups learn dart skill. On the other hand, the subjects of two groups improved significantly in acquisition and retention phases rather than pre-test phase. Moreover, the results of independent t-test showed that there was no significant difference between unilateral and cross lateral in acquisition and retention tests. Our findings revealed that interaction between hand and eye dominance does not affect dart skill.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查眼手优势之间的交互作用对飞镖技巧的影响。 Shahid Chamran大学的20名健康男性受试者(年龄:21.43±1.33)参加了这项研究。将受试者分为两组:单侧(右眼和右手或左眼和左手)组(10个受试者)和横向(右眼和左手或左眼或右手)组(10个受试者)。每个小组在相同条件下训练12节。在最后一次培训之后进行了获取测试,并在1周后进行了保留测试。记录预测试,习得和保留的分数。在每个培训课程中,受试者投掷60支飞镖。 Porta(Roth,2002)和Hole in card test(Sage,1984)用于选择眼睛优势度,爱丁堡问卷(Oldfield,1971)用于确定惯性。 p <0.05的值选择为显着。依赖t检验(配对t检验)分析的结果表明,两组之间的预测试,获取和保留之间存在显着差异,这表明两组都学习了飞镖技能。另一方面,两组受试者在获取和保留阶段而不是测试前阶段都有显着改善。此外,独立t检验的结果表明,在获取和保留测试中,单侧和横向之间没有显着差异。我们的发现表明,手和眼优势之间的相互作用不会影响飞镖技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号