class="Heading">Background class="Para">The treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures is still controversial. class="Heading">Materials and methods class="Para">Sixteen consecutive patients admitted at University Hospital with intra-articular fractures were treated with fine wire circular frames and followed up at an average of 160?days from their injuries. We focused on radiological outcome and functional outcome using a patient-based questionnaire. class="Heading">Results class="Para">We had no secondary reconstruction procedures. With the numbers available, the difference between the preoperative values and the follow-up measurements for B?hler’s angle, Gissane’s angle and posterior subtalar joint space was not statistically significant (P?=?0.8, P?=?0.2, and P?=?0.4, respectively). The standardized AAOS FAS ranged from 42 to 96, with a mean of 80 and a standard deviation of 19. class="Heading">Conclusions class="Para">Fine wire circular frame is a good alternative to ORIF in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures, yielding good patient function, a high return-to-work rate and a low complication rate.
展开▼
机译：class =“ Heading”>背景 class =“ Para”>移位的跟骨关节内骨折的治疗仍存在争议。 class =“ Heading”>材料和方法< / h3> class =“ Para”>在大学医院收治的16例关节内骨折的连续患者，接受了细钢丝圆形框架的治疗，受伤后平均随访160天。我们使用基于患者的问卷调查关注放射学结果和功能结果。 class =“ Heading”>结果 class =“ Para”>我们没有二次重建程序。有了可用的数字，术前Boller角，Gissane角和距后tal下关节间隙的测量值与后续测量值之间的差异无统计学意义（ P ？=分别为0.8， P ？=？0.2）。标准化的AAOS FAS范围从42到96，平均为80，标准偏差为19。 class =“ Heading”>结论 class =“ Para”>细钢丝圆框架是置换关节内跟骨骨折中ORIF的良好替代方法，具有良好的患者功能，较高的返工率和较低的并发症发生率。
展开▼
