首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology: official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology >A comparison of two rehabilitation protocols after total knee arthroplasty: does flexion affect mobility and blood loss?
【24h】

A comparison of two rehabilitation protocols after total knee arthroplasty: does flexion affect mobility and blood loss?

机译:全膝关节置换术后两种康复方案的比较:屈曲会影响活动性和失血吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

We report a prospective trial comparing the effectveness of a post-operative flexion regime versus a standard extension regime on the early outcome and on the post-operative blood loss of total knee arthroplasty. Fourty-eight knees were divided to two different post-operative rehabilitation regimes: a flexion regime and an extension regime. The two groups were well matched with respect to age, gender, operation side and pre-op diagnosis All patients were implanted with a NexGen cemented total knee prosthesis and all operations were performed by the same surgeon. Patients were assessed pre-operatively, at the time of discharge, at 6 weeks and at 12 weeks, and were evaluated by means of the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the WOMAC score, the Clarkson criteria for range of motion and muscolar strength measurement, and the Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS) for the pain. Futhermore, postoperative blood loss was assessed by comparing the volume of blood in the drain at the time of their removal and measuring the difference in preoperative and postoperative blood haemoglobin (Hb) in the 2 groups. Patients subjected to the flexion regime had a better KSS and Womac score after 12 weeks and had less post-operative blood loss, requiring fewer blood transfusions. No differences were found between the two groups in terms of pain and muscolar strength. We believe a flexion regime after a total knee arthroplasty is a valid option of rehabilitation treatment and does not result in an increase in wound problems.
机译:我们报告了一项前瞻性试验,比较了术后屈曲方案和标准伸展方案对早期结果和全膝关节置换术失血量的效果。将四十八个膝盖分为两种不同的术后康复方案:屈曲方案和伸展方案。两组在年龄,性别,手术侧和术前诊断方面均非常匹配。所有患者均植入了NexGen骨水泥全膝关节假体,所有手术均由同一位外科医生进行。术前,出院时,第6周和第12周对患者进行评估,并通过膝关节社会评分(KSS)和WOMAC评分,运动范围和粘膜强度测量的Clarkson标准进行评估,以及用于疼痛的言语数字量表(VNS)。此外,通过比较排泄时的引流血量并测量两组术前和术后血红蛋白(Hb)的差异来评估术后失血。接受屈曲疗法的患者在12周后具有更好的KSS和Womac评分,术后失血更少,需要更少的输血。两组在疼痛和粘膜强度方面没有差异。我们认为,全膝关节置换术后的屈曲方案是康复治疗的有效选择,不会导致伤口问题的增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号