• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Health Care Interventions Delivered Over the Internet: How Systematic was the Review? - Author's Reply
【24h】

Health Care Interventions Delivered Over the Internet: How Systematic was the Review? - Author's Reply

机译：通过互联网提供的医疗保健干预措施：审查的系统性如何？ -作者的回复

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Author's ResponseWe thank Evan Mayo-Wilson for raising the issue on how systematic and exhaustive our search for our recent qualitative analysis [1] was. This was not a systematic review as in a common usage of the term for example by the Cochrane Collaboration. We used systematic methods to undertake a qualitative review of the literature on health care interventions delivered over the Internet. To identify common themes it was important to identify a broad range of published studies but we did not feel that it was necessary to be exhaustive. In our paper we describe in some detail how we identified the literature including the use of three existing systematic reviews, a hand search of JMIR and our own previously published literature review. Through the triangulation of these search approaches we aimed to identify the main body of relevant literature. We realise we may not have identified every published paper of relevance.Thank you for drawing our attention to the paper by Klein and Richards [2]. This paper would be excluded from our review. As mentioned in our paper the focus of our review was interventions where the networking provided by the Internet is a component of the intervention. One of our exclusion criteria was “no networked features, such as computer-based decision support systems delivered from a CD or interventions where there was no use of the Internet beyond delivery (ie, they could have been delivered by a CD)”. From the description of the intervention in the Klein and Richards paper it appears to have no networked features.
机译：作者的回复我们感谢Evan Mayo-Wilson提出的问题，即我们对我们最近的定性分析[1]进行的搜索有多么系统和详尽。这不是像Cochrane协作组织这样的术语的常用用法，而是系统的审查。我们使用系统的方法对通过互联网提供的卫生保健干预措施的文献进行了定性审查。为了确定共同的主题，重要的是确定广泛的已发表的研究，但我们认为没有必要详尽无遗。在我们的论文中，我们详细描述了我们如何识别文献，包括使用三个现有的系统综述，对JMIR的手动搜索以及我们自己先前发表的文献综述。通过这些搜索方法的三角剖分，我们旨在确定相关文献的主体。我们意识到我们可能尚未确定所有相关的论文。感谢您引起我们对Klein和Richards [2]的关注。这篇论文将被排除在我们的评论之外。如本文所述，我们的审查重点是干预措施，其中互联网提供的网络是干预措施的组成部分。我们的排除标准之一是“没有网络功能，例如从CD提供的基于计算机的决策支持系统，或者干预措施，在交付之外没有使用互联网的情况下（即CD可以交付）。”从克莱因和理查兹（Klein and Richards）论文中的干预描述来看，它似乎没有网络功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号