• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology >Assessment of nutritional knowledge in female athletes susceptible to the Female Athlete Triad syndrome
【24h】

Assessment of nutritional knowledge in female athletes susceptible to the Female Athlete Triad syndrome

机译：易患女运动员三联征的女运动员的营养知识评估

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background The study aimed to i) assess nutritional knowledge in female athletes susceptible to the Female Athlete Triad (FAT) syndrome and to compare with controls; and ii) to compare nutritional knowledge of those who were classified as being 'at risk' for developing FAT syndrome and those who are 'not at risk'. Methods In this study, participants completed General Nutritional Knowledge Questionnaire (GNKQ), the Eating Attitude Test (EAT-26) and survey measures of training/physical activity, menstrual and skeletal injury history. The sample consisted of 48 regional endurance athletes, 11 trampoline gymnasts and 32 untrained controls. Based on proxy measures for the FAT components, participants were classified being 'at risk' or 'not at risk' and nutrition knowledge scores were compared for the two groups. Formal education related to nutrition was considered. Results A considerably higher percentage of athletes were classified 'at risk' of menstrual dysfunction than controls (28.8% and 9.4%, respectively) and a higher percentage scored at or above the cutoff value of 20 on the EAT-26 test among athletes than controls (10.2% and 3.1%, respectively). 8.5% of athletes were classified 'at risk' for bone mineral density in contrast to none from the control group. Nutrition knowledge and eating attitude appeared to be independent for both athletes and controls. GNKQ scores of athletes were higher than controls but the differences between the knowledge of 'at risk' and 'not at risk' athletes and controls were inconsequential. Formal education in nutrition or closely related subjects does not have an influence on nutrition knowledge or on being classified as 'at risk' or 'not at risk'. Conclusion The lack of difference in nutrition knowledge between 'at risk' and 'not at risk' athletes suggests that lack of information is not accountable for restricted eating associated with the Female Athlete Triad.
机译：背景研究旨在：i）评估易患女运动员三合会（FAT）综合征的女运动员的营养知识，并与对照组进行比较; ii）比较那些被分类为“有发展中的FAT综合征危险”的人和那些“没有危险”的人的营养知识。方法在本研究中，参与者完成了一般营养知识问卷（GNKQ），饮食态度测验（EAT-26）并调查了训练/身体活动，月经和骨骼损伤史的测量方法。样本由48位区域耐力运动员，11位蹦床体操运动员和32位未经训练的对照组组成。根据FAT成分的替代指标，将参与者分类为“有风险”或“无风险”，并比较两组的营养知识得分。考虑了与营养有关的正规教育。结果月经功能障碍“处于危险状态”的运动员比例明显高于对照组（分别为28.8％和9.4％），而在EAT-26测试中，达到或高于临界值20的运动员比例高于对照组。 （分别为10.2％和3.1％）。与对照组相比，8.5％的运动员被归为“骨矿物质密度处于危险状态”。营养知识和饮食态度似乎对运动员和控制者都是独立的。运动员的GNKQ得分高于对照组，但“有风险”和“无风险”的运动员与对照组之间的知识差异并不重要。营养学或与之密切相关的学科的正规教育不会影响营养知识或被归类为“有风险”或“无风险”。结论“有风险”和“无风险”运动员之间营养知识的差异不足表明，缺乏信息不能解释与女运动员三重征有关的饮食限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号