...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Double-standards in reporting of risk and responsibility for sexual health: a qualitative content analysis of negatively toned UK newsprint articles
【24h】

Double-standards in reporting of risk and responsibility for sexual health: a qualitative content analysis of negatively toned UK newsprint articles

机译：性健康风险和责任报告的双重标准：对定调的英国新闻纸文章的定性内容分析

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background The need to challenge messages that reinforce harmful negative discourses around sexual risk and responsibility is a priority in improving sexual health. The mass media are an important source of information regularly alerting, updating and influencing public opinions and the way in which sexual health issues are framed may play a crucial role in shaping expectations of who is responsible for sexual health risks and healthy sexual practices. Methods We conducted an in-depth, qualitative analysis of 85 negatively toned newspaper articles reporting on sexual health topics to examine how risk and responsibility have been framed within these in relation to gender. Articles published in 2010 in seven UK and three Scottish national newspapers were included. A latent content analysis approach was taken, focusing on interpreting the underlying meaning of text. Results A key theme in the articles was men being framed as a risk to women’s sexual health, whilst it was part of a women’s role to “resist” men’s advances. Such discourses tended to portray a power imbalance in sexual relationships between women and men. A number of articles argued that it was women who needed to take more responsibility for sexual health. Articles repeatedly suggested that women and teenage girls in particular, lacked the skills and confidence to negotiate safer sex and sex education programmes were often presented as having failed. Men were frequently portrayed as being more promiscuous and engaging in more risky sexual health behaviours than women, yet just one article drew attention to the lack of focus on male responsibility for sexual health. Gay men were used as a bench mark against which rates were measured and framed as being a risk and at risk. Conclusions The framing of men as a risk to women, whilst women are presented at the same time as responsible for patrolling sexual encounters, organising contraception and preventing sexual ill health reinforces gender stereotypes and undermines efforts to promote a collective responsibility for sexual health. This has implications for sexual ill health prevention and could continue to reinforce a negative culture around sex, relationships and sexual health in the UK.
机译：背景技术挑战信息以增强围绕性风险和责任的有害消极言论的需求是改善性健康的优先事项。大众媒体是定期提醒，更新和影响公众舆论的重要信息来源，而性健康问题的构成方式可能在塑造对谁负责性健康风险和健康性行为的期望方面发挥关键作用。方法我们对85篇负面报道的性健康报纸文章进行了深入，定性的分析，以研究在性别方面这些文章中的风险和责任是如何构成的。收录了2010年在七个英国和三个苏格兰国家报纸上发表的文章。采取了潜在的内容分析方法，重点在于解释文本的基本含义。结果文章中的一个关键主题是，男性被认为是对女性性健康的威胁，而这却是女性“抵制”男性进步的角色的一部分。这种话语往往描绘出男女之间性关系中的力量失衡。许多文章认为，女性需要对性健康承担更多责任。文章反复指出，特别是妇女和少女，缺乏谈判安全性行为的技巧和信心，而性教育计划常常被认为失败了。人们经常把男人描绘成比女人更滥交，从事更危险的性健康行为，但只有一篇文章提请人们注意对男性的性健康责任缺乏关注。使用男同性恋者作为基准，以此来衡量和确定利率是有风险的还是有风险的。结论男性构成对妇女的危险，而女性则同时负责巡逻性接触，组织避孕和预防性健康不良，这加剧了性别定型观念，破坏了促进集体对性健康负责的努力。这对预防性病健康有影响，在英国可能会继续加剧围绕性，人际关系和性健康的负面文化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号