...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Measured, opportunistic, unexpected and na?ve quitting: a qualitative grounded theory study of the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective
【24h】

Measured, opportunistic, unexpected and na?ve quitting: a qualitative grounded theory study of the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective

机译：衡量，机会主义，意外和幼稚的退出：从前烟民的角度出发对定性过程进行定性的理论研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background To better understand the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective, and to explore the role spontaneity and planning play in quitting. Methods Qualitative grounded theory study using in-depth interviews with 37 Australian adult ex-smokers (24–68?years; 15 males, 22 females) who quit smoking in the past 6–24?months (26 quit unassisted; 11 used assistance). Results Based on participants’ accounts of quitting, we propose a typology of quitting experiences: measured, opportunistic, unexpected and na?ve. Two key features integral to participants’ accounts of their quitting experiences were used as the basis of the typology: (1) the apparent onset of quitting (gradual through to sudden); and (2) the degree to which the smoker appeared to have prepared for quitting (no evidence through to clear evidence of preparation). The resulting 2?×?2 matrix of quitting experiences took into consideration three additional characteristics: (1) the presence or absence of a clearly identifiable trigger; (2) the amount of effort (cognitive and practical) involved in quitting; and (3) the type of cognitive process that characterised the quitting experience (reflective; impulsive; reflective and impulsive). Conclusions Quitting typically included elements of spontaneity (impulsive behaviour) and preparation (reflective behaviour), and, importantly, the investment of time and cognitive effort by participants prior to quitting. Remarkably few participants quit completely out-of-the-blue with little or no preparation. Findings are discussed in relation to stages-of-change theory, catastrophe theory, and dual?process theories, focusing on how dual?process theories may provide a way of conceptualising how quitting can include elements of both spontaneity and preparation.
机译：背景信息为了从前烟民的角度更好地了解戒烟过程，并探讨自发性和计划在戒烟中的作用。方法采用定性扎根的理论研究方法，对过去6-24个月内戒烟的37名澳大利亚成年前吸烟者（24-68岁; 15名男性，22名女性）进行深入访谈（26名无助者; 11名使用过帮助） 。结果根据参与者的戒烟情况，我们提出了戒烟经历的类型：测量的，机会主义的，意外的和幼稚的。参与者陈述其戒烟经历不可或缺的两个关键特征被用作分类学的基础：（1）戒烟的明显发作（逐渐到突然）; （2）吸烟者似乎已准备戒烟的程度（没有证据可以明确准备）。戒烟经历的结果2××2矩阵考虑了三个附加特征：（1）是否存在可明确识别的触发器; （2）戒烟所涉及的努力（认知和实践）; （3）表征戒烟经历的认知过程类型（反思性，冲动性，反思性和冲动性）。结论戒烟通常包括自发性（冲动行为）和准备（反射性行为）的要素，重要的是，参与者在戒烟之前投入时间和认知。很少有参与者几乎没有准备就完全放弃了。讨论了与变化阶段理论，巨灾理论和双重过程理论相关的发现，重点是双重过程理论如何提供概念化戒烟如何包含自发性和准备性要素的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号