...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Quantitative urine cultures do not reliably detect renal candidiasis in rabbits.
【24h】

Quantitative urine cultures do not reliably detect renal candidiasis in rabbits.

机译:定量尿培养不能可靠地检测兔子的肾念珠菌病。

获取原文
           

摘要

The significance of quantitative urine cultures in patients at risk for hematogenous disseminated candidiasis is controversial. While various concentrations of Candida spp. in urine have been suggested as critical cutoff points in the diagnosis of renal candidiasis, other investigators consider quantitative cultures less critical in diagnosing upper tract infections. To determine the significance of quantitative urine cultures in renal candidiasis, we studied serial quantitative urinary cultures of Candida albicans in a rabbit model of hematogenous infection. Of 197 urine samples from 34 infected animals, 144 were culture positive, with a sensitivity of 73.1% for urine cultures and a lower limit of detection of 10 CFU/ml. The yield of urine cultures varied according to severity and duration of infection. The mean renal and urinary concentrations of C. albicans from rabbits with subacute candidiasis differed significantly from those from rabbits with acute candidiasis (P = 0.013 and P < or = 0.001, respectively). During the first 4 days of subacute renal candidiasis, more than one-half of all urine cultures were negative for C. albicans. Only 12 (8.1%) of 148 urine cultures in animals with subacute renal candidiasis had concentrations of > 10(3) CFU/ml, 2.7% had concentrations of > 10(4) CFU/ml, and none were > or = 10(5) CFU/ml. By comparison, all urine cultures from the animals with lethal acute renal candidiasis had higher concentrations of C. albicans and were positive throughout the course of infection. Urinary concentrations of C. albicans were not predictive of the amount of Candida in the kidney (r < or = 0.49) and did not correlate with survival (r = 0.0232). However, the renal concentration of C. albicans (in CFU/gram) inversely correlated with the duration of survival (in days) of rabbits with renal candidiasis (r = 0.76; P < 0.001). These findings indicate that a negative urine culture in rabbits does not preclude the presence of renal candidiasis. The interpretation of a urine culture positive at any concentration, on the other hand, must involve an analysis of the risk factors for renal candidiasis, for any urinary concentration of C. albicans may reflect kidney infection.
机译:在有血源性传播念珠菌病风险的患者中定量尿培养的意义是有争议的。而各种浓度的念珠菌属。尿液中的尿素已被认为是诊断肾念珠菌病的关键分界点,其他研究者则认为定量培养对诊断上呼吸道感染的重要性较低。为了确定尿液定量培养在肾念珠菌病中的重要性,我们在兔血源性感染模型中研究了白色念珠菌的连续定量尿培养。在来自34只受感染动物的197个尿液样品中,有144个培养阳性,对尿液培养的敏感性为73.1%,检测下限为10 CFU / ml。尿培养物的产量根据感染的严重程度和持续时间而变化。亚急性念珠菌病兔子的白色念珠菌的平均肾脏和尿液浓度与急性念珠菌病兔子的平均浓度有显着差异(分别为P = 0.013和P <或= 0.001)。在亚急性肾念珠菌病的前4天中,所有尿液培养物中超过一半的白色念珠菌阴性。在亚急性肾念珠菌病动物中148种尿培养物中只有12种(8.1%)的浓度> 10(3)CFU / ml,2.7%的浓度> 10(4)CFU / ml,且没有> 10 =(10) 5)CFU /毫升相比之下,来自具有致命急性肾念珠菌病的动物的所有尿培养物均具有较高的白色念珠菌浓度,并且在整个感染过程中均为阳性。尿白念珠菌的尿液浓度不能预测肾脏中念珠菌的含量(r <或= 0.49),并且与生存率无关(r = 0.0232)。然而,白色念珠菌的肾脏浓度(CFU /克)与肾念珠菌病兔子的生存时间(天)成反比(r = 0.76; P <0.001)。这些发现表明,兔子尿液培养阴性并不排除存在肾念珠菌病。另一方面,任何浓度的尿培养阳性的解释都必须分析肾念珠菌病的危险因素,因为任何尿中的白色念珠菌浓度都可能反映肾脏感染。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号