...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Comparison of Oral Clonidine and Midazolam as Premedications in Children
【24h】

Comparison of Oral Clonidine and Midazolam as Premedications in Children

机译:儿童口服可乐定和咪达唑仑的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Oral premedication is widely being used in paediatric anaesthesia to reduce the pre-operative anxiety and to ensure a smooth induction. Midazolam is currently the most commonly used premedicant in children. Clonidine, an alpha-2 agonist due to its sedative properties, is also being used. Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical effects of oral midazolam and oral clonidine. Settings and Design: This study was conducted as a single blind trial on 60 children who were in the age group of 2-8 years. Methods and Material: The children were randomly divided into two groups and they were given either clonidine 4 mcg/kg (Group I, n=30) or midazolam 0.5 mg/kg (Group II, n=30) orally, which were dissolved in honey and water solution, 60 minutes prior to the mask induction. The drug acceptance, pre-operative sedation and anxiolysis, parental separation, quality of induction and mask acceptance, the effect on the haemodynamics and the adverse effects were evaluated. Statistical Analysis Used: All the values were reported as range and mean±SD. The data analysis for the numerical data was performed by the unpaired Student?s t-test and for the categorical data, the analysis was performed by the Fisher?s exact test or the Chi-Square test. Other data were reported as mean ± SD or frequency (%). A p value of≤ 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results and Conclusions: Oral clonidine tasted significantly better than oral midazolam. The onset of the sedation was significantly faster after the premedication with midazolam (30.5 ± 10.8 minutes) than with clonidine (38.5 ± 12.26 minutes). A satisfactory sedation could be achieved with both the drugs, but the quality of the sedation was significantly better after the premedication with clonidine. The difference in the onset of the anxiolysis was found to be statistically insignificant. A satisfactory anxiolysis was achieved with both, but the quality of the anxiolysis was better with clonidine. The quality of the mask induction was equally satisfactory in both the groups. A steal-induction was performed on 56.7% of the patients of the clonidine group, but on none in the midazolam group. No adverse effects like bradycardia, hypotension, hypoxaemia or apnoea were observed during the peri-operative period in both the clonidine and the midazolam groups. We concluded that oral clonidine is a good alternative to oral midazolam as a premedication in children.
机译:背景:儿科麻醉中广泛使用口服前药治疗,以减少术前焦虑并确保顺利引产。咪达唑仑目前是儿童中最常用的前药。也使用可乐定,一种具有镇静作用的α-2激动剂。目的:本研究的目的是比较口服咪达唑仑和口服可乐定的临床疗效。设置和设计:这项研究是对60名2-8岁的儿童进行的单盲试验。方法和材料:将儿童随机分为两组,分别口服可乐定4 mcg / kg(I组,n = 30)或咪达唑仑0.5 mg / kg(II组,n = 30),将其溶解于面膜诱导前60分钟,加入蜂蜜和水溶液。评估药物的接受程度,术前的镇静和抗焦虑作用,父母分离,诱导和面罩接受的质量,对血流动力学的影响和不良反应。使用的统计分析:所有值均报告为范围和平均值±SD。数值数据的数据分析是通过不成对的Student t检验进行的;分类数据的数据分析是通过Fisher精确检验或卡方检验进行的。其他数据报告为平均值±SD或频率(%)。 p值≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果与结论:口服可乐定的味道明显优于口服咪达唑仑。咪达唑仑用药前(30.5±10.8分钟)的镇静作用明显快于可乐定(38.5±12.26分钟)。两种药物均可达到令人满意的镇静作用,但可乐定在用药前镇静的质量明显更好。发现抗焦虑发作的差异在统计学上不显着。两者均达到令人满意的抗焦虑作用,但可乐定的抗焦虑作用更好。两组患者的面罩感应质量均令人满意。可乐定组中56.7%的患者进行了偷窃诱导,但咪达唑仑组中没有一个。可乐定组和咪达唑仑组在围手术期均未观察到心动过缓,低血压,低氧血症或呼吸暂停等不良反应。我们得出的结论是,口服可乐定是口服咪达唑仑的良好替代品,可作为儿童的处方药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号